C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart D—Evaluations, Eligibility Determinations, Individualized Education Programs, and Educational Placements

34 C.F.R. § 300.300

Parental consent

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Parental consent for initial evaluation. (1)(i) The public agency proposing to conduct an initial evaluation to determine if a child qualifies as a child with a disability under § 300.8 must, after providing notice consistent with §§ 300.503 and 300.504, obtain informed consent, consistent with § 300.9, from the parent of the child before conducting the evaluation.

(ii) Parental consent for initial evaluation must not be construed as consent for initial provision of special education and related services.

(iii) The public agency must make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability.

(2) For initial evaluations only, if the child is a ward of the State and is not residing with the child's parent, the public agency is not required to obtain informed consent from the parent for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability if—

(i) Despite reasonable efforts to do so, the public agency cannot discover the whereabouts of the parent of the child;

(ii) The rights of the parents of the child have been terminated in accordance with State law; or

(iii) The rights of the parent to make educational decisions have been subrogated by a judge in accordance with State law and consent for an initial evaluation has been given by an individual appointed by the judge to represent the child.

(3)(i) If the parent of a child enrolled in public school or seeking to be enrolled in public school does not provide consent for initial evaluation under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or the parent fails to respond to a request to provide consent, the public agency may, but is not required to, pursue the initial evaluation of the child by utilizing the procedural safeguards in subpart E of this part (including the mediation procedures under § 300.506 or the due process procedures under §§ 300.507 through 300.516), if appropriate, except to the extent inconsistent with State law relating to such parental consent.

(ii) The public agency does not violate its obligation under § 300.111 and §§ 300.301 through 300.311 if it declines to pursue the evaluation.

(b) Parental consent for services. (1) A public agency that is responsible for making FAPE available to a child with a disability must obtain informed consent from the parent of the child before the initial provision of special education and related services to the child.

(2) The public agency must make reasonable efforts to obtain informed consent from the parent for the initial provision of special education and related services to the child.

(3) If the parent of a child fails to respond to a request for, or refuses to consent to, the initial provision of special education and related services, the public agency—

(i) May not use the procedures in subpart E of this part (including the mediation procedures under § 300.506 or the due process procedures under §§ 300.507 through 300.516) in order to obtain agreement or a ruling that the services may be provided to the child;

(ii) Will not be considered to be in violation of the requirement to make FAPE available to the child because of the failure to provide the child with the special education and related services for which the parent refuses to or fails to provide consent; and

(iii) Is not required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP under §§ 300.320 and 300.324 for the child.

(4) If, at any time subsequent to the initial provision of special education and related services, the parent of a child revokes consent in writing for the continued provision of special education and related services, the public agency—

(i) May not continue to provide special education and related services to the child, but must provide prior written notice in accordance with § 300.503 before ceasing the provision of special education and related services;

(ii) May not use the procedures in subpart E of this part (including the mediation procedures under § 300.506 or the due process procedures under §§ 300.507 through 300.516) in order to obtain agreement or a ruling that the services may be provided to the child;

(iii) Will not be considered to be in violation of the requirement to make FAPE available to the child because of the failure to provide the child with further special education and related services; and

(iv) Is not required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP under §§ 300.320 and 300.324 for the child for further provision of special education and related services.

(c) Parental consent for reevaluations. (1) Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, each public agency—

(i) Must obtain informed parental consent, in accordance with § 300.300(a)(1), prior to conducting any reevaluation of a child with a disability.

(ii) If the parent refuses to consent to the reevaluation, the public agency may, but is not required to, pursue the reevaluation by using the consent override procedures described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

(iii) The public agency does not violate its obligation under § 300.111 and §§ 300.301 through 300.311 if it declines to pursue the evaluation or reevaluation.

(2) The informed parental consent described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section need not be obtained if the public agency can demonstrate that—

(i) It made reasonable efforts to obtain such consent; and

(ii) The child's parent has failed to respond.

(d) Other consent requirements.

(1) Parental consent is not required before—

(i) Reviewing existing data as part of an evaluation or a reevaluation; or

(ii) Administering a test or other evaluation that is administered to all children unless, before administration of that test or evaluation, consent is required of parents of all children.

(2) In addition to the parental consent requirements described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, a State may require parental consent for other services and activities under this part if it ensures that each public agency in the State establishes and implements effective procedures to ensure that a parent's refusal to consent does not result in a failure to provide the child with FAPE.

(3) A public agency may not use a parent's refusal to consent to one service or activity under paragraphs (a), (b), (c), or (d)(2) of this section to deny the parent or child any other service, benefit, or activity of the public agency, except as required by this part.

(4)(i) If a parent of a child who is home schooled or placed in a private school by the parents at their own expense does not provide consent for the initial evaluation or the reevaluation, or the parent fails to respond to a request to provide consent, the public agency may not use the consent override procedures (described in paragraphs (a)(3) and (c)(1) of this section); and

(ii) The public agency is not required to consider the child as eligible for services under §§ 300.132 through 300.144.

(5) To meet the reasonable efforts requirement in paragraphs (a)(1)(iii), (a)(2)(i), (b)(2), and (c)(2)(i) of this section, the public agency must document its attempts to obtain parental consent using the procedures in § 300.322(d).

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(a)(1)(D) and 1414(c)) [71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 73027, Dec. 1, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: J v. a Minor, by her Mother & Next Best Friend, Anette H. Veldhuyzen v. Stafford Cnty. Sch. Bd, 792 S.E.2d 286 (Va. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J v. a Minor, by her Mother & Next Best Friend, Anette H. Veldhuyzen v. Stafford Cnty. Sch. Bd, 792 S.E.2d 286 (Va. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “” 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (d)(4). Virginia has added to its regulations several provisions requiring parental consent that are not found in the federal regulatory framework.”
J.B. v. Kyrene Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 28, 112 F.4th 1156 (9th Cir. 2024). · cites it 4× “After a student’s initial evaluation and the formation of an IEP, the school or the parent may request to reevaluate the student.”
Stanek v. St. Charles Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 303, 783 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2015). “See 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (c). But by then they did not trust his teachers, and so they refused to consent.”
Georgia Ass'n of Retarded Citizens, Cross v. Dr. Charles McDaniel Etc., Cross-Appellees, 716 F.2d 1565 (11th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “In a brief filed in the district court, the Department stated that "under existing regulations implementing EHA-B (34 CFR 300.300) and section 504 ... state rule or policy that imposes time limitations on the provision of services to handicapped children precludes an individual…”
Kimble v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. Re-1, 925 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (D. Colo. 2013). · cites it 3× “34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (b)(4). Where a parent revokes consent, the school district must cease providing special education and related services, has no further obligation to develop an IEP for the child, and “[w]ill not be considered to be in violation of the requirement to make…”
I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 257 F. Supp. 3d 946 (E.D. Tenn. 2017). “” 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (d)(3); see also Assistance to the States, 64 Fed.”
S.H. Ex Rel. A.H. v. Plano Indep. Sch. Dist., 487 F. App'x 850 (5th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “1096(f), “[t]he procedures in 34 CFR, §§ 300.300 , 300.504, 300.507, 300.”
M.G. v. Dist. of Columbia, 246 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017). “§ 1400 (d)(1)(A); 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 ; see also Boose v. District of Columbia, 786 F.”
Aw, 1 by His Parents, Debra D. Wilson & Christopher D. Wilson v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 372 F.3d 674 (4th Cir. 2004). “, 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (a)(3)(ii) (stating that placement decisions should be made based on the child’s "unique needs”); 34 C.”
Parent V.S., on Behalf of Student A.O. v. Los Gatos-Saratoga Jt. Union High Sch. Dist., 484 F.3d 1230 (9th Cir. 2007). “350 (providing detailed requirements for the development of eligible children’s IEPs); 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (FAPE requirement triggered by being a “child! ] with a disability.”
Hupp v. Switzerland of Ohio Local Sch. Dist., 912 F. Supp. 2d 572 (S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 3× “34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (b)(7). B. Administrative Conclusions Plaintiffs filed a due process complaint pursuant to the IDEIA against Defendant School’ District.”
Schoenbach v. Dist. of Columbia, 309 F. Supp. 2d 71 (D.D.C. 2004). “”); 34 C.F.R. § 300.300 (a)(3)(ii). A full evaluation of a child is an integral part of developing an appropriate IEP.”
Show all 75 citing cases →
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.300(b)(2) — 1 case
Merrifield Ex Rel. Merrifield v. Lake Cent. Sch. Corp., 770 F. Supp. 468 (N.D. Ind. 1991).
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.300(b)(3) — 1 case
Stewart v. Salem Sch. Dist. 24J, 670 P.2d 1048 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.