C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart E—Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children

34 C.F.R. § 300.500

Responsibility of SEA and other public agencies

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Each SEA must ensure that each public agency establishes, maintains, and implements procedural safeguards that meet the requirements of §§ 300.500 through 300.536.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(a))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases, 1982–2020 · leading case: G.D. Etc. v. Westmoreland Sch. Dist., 930 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
G.D. Etc. v. Westmoreland Sch. Dist., 930 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “§ 1415 (b)(1)(A) (providing “an opportunity for the parents or guardian of a handicapped child to examine all relevant records with respect to the identification, evaluation, and educational placement of the child”); 34 C.F.R. § 300.500 (defining parental consent and its…”
Alston v. Dist. of Columbia, 439 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D.D.C. 2006). · cites it 2× “8 ; 34 C.F.R. § 300.500 . Although the defendants introduce a declaration from a DCPS representative that Alston agreed C.”
I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 257 F. Supp. 3d 946 (E.D. Tenn. 2017). “34 C.F.R. § 300.500 . The Tennessee government and the Department of Education have done so.”
Cypress-Fairbanks Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Michael F. B/n/f/ Mr. & Mrs. Barry F., 118 F.3d 245 (5th Cir. 1997). “531-2 (assessment); 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.500 (least restrictive environment); 34 C.”
Caroline T. v. Hudson Sch. Dist., 915 F.2d 752 (1st Cir. 1990). · cites it 2× “Although it is true that, as appellants argue, hearing officers have a responsibility to conduct hearings in a manner consistent with impartiality, 34 C.F.R. § 300.500 ; N.H.Code of Admin. R.”
ISD No. 283 v. E.M.D.H., a minor, 960 F.3d 1073 (8th Cir. 2020). “§§ 1401 (3), (9), 1414(d), 34 C.F.R. § 300.500 (a), (c); see Endrew F.”
CM Ex Rel. JM v. Bd. of Pub. Educ., 184 F. Supp. 2d 466 (W.D.N.C. 2002). · cites it 2× “34 C.F.R. § 300.500 . A TEACCH evaluation was prepared for the child on July 27,1993, by the Asheville TEACCH Center.”
Engwiller v. Pine Plains Cent. Sch. Dist., 110 F. Supp. 2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “See 34 C.F.R. § 300.500 (a) (“Each SEA shall ensure that each public agency establishes, maintains, and implements procedural safeguards that meet the requirements of §§ 300.”
Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. Re 1, 290 F. Supp. 3d 1175 (D. Colo. 2018). “§§ 1400 and 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.500 , et. seq. Petitioner, Endrew F.”
Natrona Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Ryan, 764 P.2d 1019 (Wyo. 1988). “IV 1986) and 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.500 , et seq. (1987), which allows Tammy Ryan, as a recipient of educational services under 34 C.”
Carroll Ex Rel. Carroll v. Capalbo, 563 F. Supp. 1053 (D.R.I. 1983). “Should such a modification be indicated, any actual change in placement would trigger the full panoply of due process rights articulated in § 1415 of the Act, as augmented by 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.500 -.513, and State Regulations, IV.”
Bd. of Educ. of Montgomery Cnty. v. Hunter, 84 F. Supp. 2d 702 (D. Maryland 2000). “” In support of this contention, the Board asserts that placement at Katherine Thomas is contrary to the IDEA and 34 C.F.R. 300.500, which require school districts to ensure that disabled children are mainstreamed to the maximum extent appropriate.”
Show all 38 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.