(a) With the exceptions set forth in this section, the Administrator approves the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds that the plan satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977. In addition, continued satisfaction of the requirements of Part D for the ozone element of the SIP depends on the adoption and submittal of requirements for reasonable available control technology (RACT) by January 1985 and adoption and submittal by each subsequent January of additional RACT requirements for sources covered by Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) issued by the previous January.
(b) [Reserved]
[50 FR 25079, June 17, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 12453, Mar. 26, 1991]
Notes of Decisions
Council of Commuter Organizations v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 683 F.2d 663 (2d Cir. 1982).
· cites it 2× “at 33,981, 33,982-83; see 40 C.F.R. § 52.1673 (1981). None of the mass transit-related proposals, including those in chapter V of the document entitled “New York State Air Quality Implementation Plan For Control of Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons in New York City Metropolitan…”
Wilder v. Thomas, 854 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1988).
“The 1984 SIP, which was approved by the EPA in 1985, see 40 C.F.R. § 52.1673 (a), provides that “[t]he primary mechanism for comprehensive evaluation of major projects which may have a significant impact on air quality is the environmental impact statement (EIS).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.