C.F.R. » Title 41 » CHAPTER 51—COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED › PART 51-2—COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

41 C.F.R. § 51-2.3

Notice of proposed addition or deletion

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

At least 30 days prior to the Committee's consideration of the addition or deletion of a commodity or service to or from the Procurement List, the Committee publishes a notice in the Federal Register announcing the proposed addition or deletion and providing interested persons an opportunity to submit written data or comments on the proposal. Interested persons submitting comments in bound form should also submit an unbound copy that is capable of being legibly photocopied.

[59 FR 59341, Nov. 16, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Angelica Textile Servs., Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 208 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Angelica Textile Servs., Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 208 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “§ 47 (a)(2); 41 C.F.R. § 51-2.3 . The recent changes to the VA Acquisition Regulations did “not impact items on the AbilityOne [PJrocurement [L]ist or items that may be added to the procurement list in the future.”
Goodwill Indus. of South Florida, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). · cites it 3× “41 C.F.R. § 51-2.3 (2020). In addition, before adding or deleting items, there must be a “Determination of Suitability,” which requires: (a) For a commodity or service to be suitable for addition to the Procurement List, each of the following criteria must be satisfied: (1)…”
Bros. Cleaning Serv., Inc. v. Chair, 26 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1998). · cites it 2× “On February 6, 1995, NISH contacted the Committee about adding custodial services for Fort Leavenworth to the procurement list as required by 41 C.F.R. § 51-2.3 . Under 41 C.F.R. § 51-2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.