41 C.F.R. § 60-1.6

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1976 · leading case: Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412 F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976).
Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412 F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976). “(See, 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.6 ). 29 C.F.R. § 70.21 (a) forbids the agency to disclose information that would expose the disclosing employee to criminal liability under 18 U.”
Legal Aid Soc'y of Alameda Cnty. v. Brennan, 381 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Cal. 1974). “See 41 C.F. R. § 60-1.6 (1973). 5 . The initial stages of this litigation involved plaintiffs’ attempts to obtain disclosure of the EEO-1, or ethnic composition reports for those nonconstruction federal contractors in Alameda County which are subject to Executive Order 11246;…”
Wesley Freeman v. George P. Shultz, 468 F.2d 120 (D.C. Cir. 1972). “There is no reason to think that there are any unique difficulties in the OFCO’s formal complaint procedures that would preclude consideration of broader claims. Neither is there any indication that the agency will fail to so interpret its mandate.”
Estinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Schlesinger, 542 F.2d 1190 (4th Cir. 1976). “(See, 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.6 ).” We accordingly think the District Court in these cases properly found that § 1905 is a statute qualifying under Exemption 3, both specifically as one of the “100 or more” statutes included therein, and by incorporation thereunder of the applicable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.