C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PROVISIONS › PART 403—SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS › Subpart B—Medicare Supplemental Policies

42 C.F.R. § 403.201

State regulation of insurance policies

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The provisions of this subpart do not affect the right of a State to regulate policies marketed in that State.

(b) Approval of a policy under the voluntary certification program, as provided for in § 403.235(b), does not authorize the insuring organization to market a policy that does not conform to applicable State laws and regulations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Marquez v. State Dep't of Health Care Servs., 240 Cal. App. 4th 87 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marquez v. State Dep't of Health Care Servs., 240 Cal. App. 4th 87 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “Therefore, the more precise question may be what DHCS meant by “action or inaction” when enacting regulation 50951 (see 42 C.F.R. § 403.201 (2014)), and DHCS’s understanding of the scope of section 10950, rather than the legislative *105 intent behind section 10950.”
Marquez v. Dept. of Health Care Servs. (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Therefore, the more precise question may be what DHCS meant by “action or inaction” when enacting regulation 50951 (see 42 C.F.R. § 403.201 (2014)), and DHCS’s understanding of the scope of section 10950, rather than the legislative intent behind section 10950.”
Marquez v. Dept. of Health Care Servs. (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “Section 10950, which grants a hearing right with respect to actions by county departments (not DHCS), applies to this proceeding only to the extent it is made applicable by regulation 50951.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.