42 C.F.R. § 424.555

Payment liability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) No payment may be made for otherwise Medicare covered items or services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary by suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and other supplies unless the supplier obtains (and renews, as set forth in section 1834(j) of the Act) Medicare billing privileges.

(b) No payment may be made for otherwise Medicare covered items or services furnished to a Medicare beneficiary by a provider or supplier if the billing privileges of the provider or supplier are deactivated, denied, or revoked, or if the provider or supplier is currently under a stay of enrollment (except as stated in § 424.541(a)(2)(ii)(B)). The Medicare beneficiary has no financial responsibility for expenses, and the provider or supplier must refund on a timely basis to the Medicare beneficiary any amounts collected from the Medicare beneficiary for these otherwise Medicare covered items or services.

(c) If any provider or supplier furnishes an otherwise Medicare covered item or service for which payment may not be made by reason of paragraph (b) of this section, any expense incurred for such otherwise Medicare covered item or service shall be the responsibility of the provider or supplier. The provider or supplier may also be criminally liable for pursuing payments that may not be made by reason of paragraph (b) of this section, in accordance with section 1128B(a)(3) of the Act.

[71 FR 20776, Apr. 21, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 79543, Nov. 16, 2023]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier Becerra, 995 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2021).
Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier Becerra, 995 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2021). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 424.555 (b). A revocation “means that .”
Golden Home Health Care, LLC v. Verma (S.D. Ohio 2020). “at 9–10 (quoting 42 C.F.R. § 424.555 (b).) The ODM Director further explains that it does not disagree with Plaintiffs’ contention that the regulations, as explained by CMS through comments, do not require the termination of a provider agreement when billing privileges are…”
White v. Becerra (E.D. Wash. 2024). “42 C.F.R. § 424.555 (b); Goffney v. Becerra, 995 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.