42 C.F.R. § 430.10
The State plan
The State plan is a comprehensive written statement submitted by the agency describing the nature and scope of its Medicaid program and giving assurance that it will be administered in conformity with the specific requirements of title XIX, the regulations in this Chapter IV, and other applicable official issuances of the Department. The State plan contains all information necessary for CMS to determine whether the plan can be approved to serve as a basis for Federal financial participation (FFP) in the State program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 176
cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.
Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. (1990)
“42 CFR § 430.10 (1989). The state plan is required to establish, among other things, a scheme for reimbursing health care providers for the medical services provided to needy individuals.”
Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (2012)
“§§1316 (a)(1), (b), 1396a(a), (b); 42 CFR §430.10 et seq. (2010); Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.”
S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. Hood (2004)
“42 CFR § 430.10 (1989). “The state plan is required to establish, among other things, a scheme for reimbursing health care providers for the medical assistance provided to eligible individuals.”
People v. Kanaan (2008)
“42 CFR § 430.10 (1989). The state plan is required to establish, among other things, *610 a scheme for reimbursing health care providers for the medical services provided to needy individuals.”
Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental Health (2020)
“§ 1396a(a); 42 C.F.R. § 430.10 . Once their plan is approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), states receive federal funds to supplement state spending on Medicaid-covered services.”
State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of State (2019)
“§ 1396a(10) ; 42 C.F.R. § 430.10 . Tennessee has participated in Medicaid since 1968.”
Children's Hospital and Health Center, a Washington Corporation v. S. Kimberly Belshe, Director, California Department o (1999)
“§ 1396a(a); 42 C.F.R. §§ 430.10 — 430.18; Wilder, 496 U.”
Westside Mothers v. Haveman (2001)
“1998) (citing 42 C.F.R. § 430.10 and Harris, 448 U.S. at 301 , 100 S.”
California Ass'n for Health Service at Home v. State Department of Health Services (2007)
“” ( 42 C.F.R. § 430.10 (2005).) Under the Medicaid Act, each state plan must, “provide such methods and procedures relating to the utilization of, and the payment for, care and services available under the plan .”
Hopkins v. Department of Human Services (2002)
“42 C.F.R. § 430.10 . The plan must also “be administered in conformity with the specific requirements of title XIX, the regulations in [42 C.”
Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Reese (2011)
“§ 1396a(b) and 42 C.F.R. §§ 430.10 , 430.15). To facilitate this objective, the federal CMS publishes the State Medicaid Manual to direct participating states in their implementation of Medicaid requirements, including the EPSDT mandate in the Medicaid Act.”
The Arc of California v. Toby Douglas (2014)
“§§ 1396-1 , 1396b(a), which “is a comprehensive written statement submitted by the [state] agency describing the nature and scope of its Medicaid program and giving assurance that it will be administered in conformity” with the Act and its accompanying regulations, 42 C.F.R. §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.