C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 431—STATE ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › Subpart F—Safeguarding Information on Applicants and Beneficiaries

42 C.F.R. § 431.305

Types of information to be safeguarded

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The agency must have criteria that govern the types of information about applicants and beneficiaries that are safeguarded.

(b) This information must include at least—

(1) Names and addresses;

(2) Medical services provided;

(3) Social and economic conditions or circumstances;

(4) Agency evaluation of personal information;

(5) Medical data, including diagnosis and past history of disease or disability; and

(6) Any information received for verifying income eligibility and amount of medical assistance payments (see § 435.940 through § 435.965 of this subchapter). Income information received from SSA or the Internal Revenue Service must be safeguarded according to the requirements of the agency that furnished the data, including section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable.

(7) Any information received in connection with the identification of legally liable third party resources under § 433.138 of this chapter.

(8) Social Security Numbers.

[44 FR 17934, Mar. 29, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 7210, Feb. 28, 1986; 52 FR 5975, Feb. 27, 1987; 77 FR 17203, Mar. 23, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Assoc. for Ret. citizens/ouachita v. Wilson, 981 So. 2d 246 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Assoc. for Ret. citizens/ouachita v. Wilson, 981 So. 2d 246 (La. Ct. App. 2008). “42 C.F.R. § 431.305 . [3] See La. R.S. 46:56(F)(4)(b) regarding release to other agencies of the state, (F)(5)(c) regarding release for professional, academic, or scholarly research, and (F)(9)(c) regarding mandatory reporters who initiated a report.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.