C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart A—General Provisions and Definitions

42 C.F.R. § 435.10

State plan requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A State plan must—

(a) Provide that the requirements of this part are met; and

(b) Specify the groups to whom Medicaid is provided, as specified in subparts B, C, and D of this part, and the conditions of eligibility for individuals in those groups.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1981–2019 · leading case: K.B. v. Michigan Dept. Of Health & Human Servs., 367 F. Supp. 3d 647 (E.D. Mich. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
K.B. v. Michigan Dept. Of Health & Human Servs., 367 F. Supp. 3d 647 (E.D. Mich. 2019). · cites it 3× “In their response, Plaintiffs argue that they "are not seeking to enforce this provision as a cause of action, but instead note Defendants' failure to comply with 42 C.F.R. § 435.10 ." ECF No. 20 at 12. 42 C.”
Markva v. Haveman, 168 F. Supp. 2d 695 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “§§ 1396 , 1396a, 42 C.F.R. § 435.10 . Federal law requires each state to designate a state agency to administer the program.”
Harris v. Lukhard, 547 F. Supp. 1015 (W.D. Va. 1982). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 435.10 (b) [1981]. In addition to these requirements, which apply to all state Medicaid programs, Virginia belongs to a sub-group of states which must comply with other requirements.”
Calkins v. Blum, 511 F. Supp. 1073 (N.D.N.Y. 1981). “§§ 1396 , 1396a; 42 C.F.R. § 435.10 . With respect to these requirements, the federal program distinguishes two groups of medicaid recipients.”
Case of Hamner, 427 So. 2d 1188 (La. 1983). “42 C.F.R. § 435.10 (1980). It is undisputed that the Louisiana State Plan submitted to the Secretary for approval provided that "all conditions of eligibility of the SSI program are applied" as to the "categorically needy" because of being aged, blind or dependent.”
Colby v. Comm'r, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 767 (Mass. App. Ct. 1984). “42 C.F.R. § 435.10 (1983). With respect to these requirements, the Federal program distinguishes two groups of medicaid recipients.”
Untitled California Attorney Gen. Opinion (Cal. Att'y Gen. 1987). “They still could be if they qualify as "categorically needy persons", as for example, by reason of their receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for their severe emotional disturbance, under subchapter XVI of the Social Security Act. The federal Act requires that persons…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.