C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart G—General Financial Eligibility Requirements and Options

42 C.F.R. § 435.608

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Est. of Krueger Ex Rel. Krueger v. Richland Cnty. Soc. Servs., 526 N.W.2d 456 (N.D. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Est. of Krueger Ex Rel. Krueger v. Richland Cnty. Soc. Servs., 526 N.W.2d 456 (N.D. 1994). · cites it 2× “" 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 . Another requires an applicant to assign rights to benefits.”
Hopkins v. Dep't of Human Servs., 802 A.2d 999 (Me. 2002). “” 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 (a). The Maine rules do not include this provision.”
Duke Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Bruton, 516 S.E.2d 633 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Citing 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 , the superior court concluded that DMA may not require Medicare enrollment as a condition of eligibility for the receipt of Medicaid, and that Medicare was not a condition of Medicaid coverage, except under the limited circumstances not applicable to…”
Marvin v. Orange Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. (2d Cir. 2022). · cites it 2× “3 (c)(1) (2022) (outlining financial eligibility requirements); see also 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 (a) (outlining a similar requirement under federal regulations).”
Hopkins v. Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). · cites it 2× “In addition, eleven days before the scheduled hearing, the petitioners first raised, over the objection of DHS, the issue of whether the petitioners could have reduced their social security benefits for “good cause” under 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 , so that they would have continued…”
Randy L. Hotmer v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin. (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “42 CFR 435.608 states, “(a) As a condition of eligibility, the agency must require applicants and beneficiaries to take all necessary steps to obtain any annuities, pensions, retirement, and disability benefits to which they are entitled, unless they can show good cause for not…”
H.S. v. Ocean Cnty. Bd. of Soc. Servs. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2026). “2d 999, 1004 (2002) (citing 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 (a)) (concluding the petitioner's denial of Medicaid benefits "based upon the application of a mathematical formula" did not constitute good cause to warrant relaxation of the eligibility requirements); Casper v.”
Est. of Palmer v. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 760 N.E.2d 80 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “As stated in 42 C.F.R. § 435.608 (1999), to be eligible for Medicaid benefits, Palmer is required to take all necessary steps to obtain pensions and retirement and disability benefits to which he is entitled, specifically including veterans’ compensation and pensions and OASDI…”
Bonville v. Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). “Hopkins, 2000 ME 129, 916 (citing 42 C.F.R. §435.608 (a)). State law does not include a “good cause” provision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.