C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart H—Specific Post-Eligibility Financial Requirements for the Categorically Needy

42 C.F.R. § 435.700

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart prescribes specific financial requirements for determining the post-eligibility treatment of income of categorically needy individuals, including requirements for applying patient income to the cost of care.

[58 FR 4931, Jan. 19, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: Trust Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs., 825 P.2d 1295 (Okla. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Trust Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs., 825 P.2d 1295 (Okla. 1991). “42 C.F.R. § 435.700 (1990) provides in pertinent part: "This subpart prescribes financial requirements for determining the eligibility of categorically needy individuals under Subparts B and C of this part.”
Reed v. Blinzinger, 639 F. Supp. 130 (S.D. Ind. 1986). “Defendants rely on 42 C.F.R. § 435.700 , which provides that AFDC eligibility requirements apply in determining Medicaid eligibility, and point to Congress’ awareness of this provision when enacting § 2373 of DRA.”
Sundberg v. Mansour, 627 F. Supp. 616 (W.D. Mich. 1986). “See 42 C.F.R. § 435.700 (“The financial eligibility requirements of AFDC .”
Missouri State Div. of Fam. Servs. v. Barclay, 705 S.W.2d 518 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985). “See 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.700 and 435.721. The catergorically needy are the aged, blind and disabled whose personal income is low enough to qualify under the SSI program.”
Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “The financial eligibility requirements of SSI or the optional state supplement program apply to those who are actually receiving those benefits; the Medicaid regulations at issue ( 42 C.F.R. § 435.700 -.740) apply only to individuals who are not receiving actual benefits.”
Buckhanon v. Percy, 533 F. Supp. 822 (E.D. Wis. 1982). “; 42 C.F.R. 435.700 and 435.'-711.” The exact amount of excess was listed.”
Peura ex rel. Herman v. Mala, 977 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1992). “See 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.700 , .725(b). Alaska has opted to provide coverage for some of the subgroups of “optional categorically needy,” see Alaska Stat.”
Golis v. Rubin, 857 F. Supp. 1407 (D. Haw. 1994). “…or recipient resides. 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(7)(B)(i); HAR § 17-620-7(a)(3) (equity in home of resident is exempt); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.700 and 435.845 and HAR § 17-675-48 (Medicaid also excludes home in which recipient resides as a countable asset). If the applicant does not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.