42 C.F.R. § 455.15

Full investigation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If the findings of a preliminary investigation give the agency reason to believe that an incident of fraud or abuse has occurred in the Medicaid program, the agency must take the following action, as appropriate:

(a) If a provider is suspected of fraud or abuse, the agency must—

(1) In States with a State Medicaid fraud control unit certified under subpart C of part 1002 of this title, refer the case to the unit under the terms of its agreement with the unit entered into under § 1002.309 of this title; or

(2) In States with no certified Medicaid fraud control unit, or in cases where no referral to the State Medicaid fraud control unit is required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, conduct a full investigation or refer the case to the appropriate law enforcement agency.

(b) If there is reason to believe that a beneficiary has defrauded the Medicaid program, the agency must refer the case to an appropriate law enforcement agency.

(c) If there is reason to believe that a beneficiary has abused the Medicaid program, the agency must conduct a full investigation of the abuse.

[48 FR 3756, Jan. 27, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 34788, Sept. 30, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2019–2023 · leading case: State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner (2019) ariz “14 , and must refer suspected provider or beneficiary fraud to the state's fraud control unit or "appropriate law enforcement agency," respectively, 42 C.F.R. § 455.15 . A state's fraud control unit must have "[a]ccess to .”
Mark J. Den Hartog v. Iowa Department of Human Services (2023) iowactapp “42 C.F.R. § 455.15 (2015). That investigation “must continue” until any number of conclusions are reached, those conclusions include a resolution between the department and provider wherein the department terminates the provider’s participation in Medicaid or seeks recovery of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.