C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER G—STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION › PART 489—PROVIDER AGREEMENTS AND SUPPLIER APPROVAL › Subpart B—Essentials of Provider Agreements

42 C.F.R. § 489.21

Specific limitations on charges

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as specified in subpart C of this part, the provider agrees not to charge a beneficiary for any of the following:

(a) Services for which the beneficiary is entitled to have payment made under Medicare.

(b) Services for which the beneficiary would be entitled to have payment made if the provider—

(1) Had in its files the required certification and recertification by a physician relating to the services furnished to the beneficiary;

(2) Had furnished the information required by the intermediary in order to determine the amount due the provider on behalf of the individual for the period with respect to which payment is to be made or any prior period;

(3) Had complied with the provisions requiring timely utilization review of long stay cases so that a limitation on days of service has not been imposed under section 1866(d) of the Act (see subpart K of part 405 and part 482 of this chapter for utilization review requirements); and

(4) Had obtained, from the beneficiary or a person acting on his or her behalf, a written request for payment to be made to the provider, and had properly filed that request. (If the beneficiary or person on his or her behalf refuses to execute a written request, the provider may charge the beneficiary for all services furnished to him or her.)

(c) Inpatient hospital services furnished to a beneficiary who exhausted his or her Part A benefits, if CMS reimburses the provider for those services.

(d) Custodial care and services not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury, if—

(1) The beneficiary was without fault in incurring the expenses; and

(2) The determination that payment was incorrect was not made until after the third year following the year in which the payment notice was sent to the beneficiary.

(e) Inpatient hospital services for which a beneficiary would be entitled to have payment made under Part A of Medicare but for a denial or reduction in payments under regulations at § 412.48 of this chapter or under section 1886(f) of the Act.

(f) Items and services furnished to a hospital inpatient (other than physicians' services as described in § 415.102(a) of this chapter or the services of an anesthetist as described in § 405.553(b)(4) of this chapter) for which Medicare payment would be made if furnished by the hospital or by other providers or suppliers under arrangements made with them by the hospital. For this purpose, a charge by another provider or supplier for such an item or service is treated as a charge by the hospital for the item or service, and is also prohibited.

(g) [Reserved]

(h) Items and services (other than those described in § 489.20(s)(1) through (15)) required to be furnished under § 489.20(s) to a resident of an SNF (defined in § 411.15(p) of this chapter), for which Medicare payment would be made if furnished by the SNF or by other providers or suppliers under arrangements made with them by the SNF. For this purpose, a charge by another provider or supplier for such an item or service is treated as a charge by the SNF for the item or service, and is also prohibited.

[49 FR 324, Jan. 3, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 22052, June 17, 1986; 52 FR 27765, July 23, 1987; 60 FR 63189, Dec. 8, 1995; 64 FR 41683, July 30, 1999; 65 FR 46796, July 31, 2000; 65 FR 62646, Oct. 19, 2000; 66 FR 39601, July 31, 2001]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: Stayton v. Delaware Health Corp., 117 A.3d 521 (Del. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stayton v. Delaware Health Corp., 117 A.3d 521 (Del. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 1395cc(a)(1)-(2); 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (a). 11 Id. at § 1395y(b)(2)(B)(iii); 42 C.”
Eldridge v. West, 458 P.3d 172 (Idaho 2020). “§ 1395cc(a)(1)–(2); 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (a). The determination of the Medicare-allowed amount (and by consequence, the write-off amount) is generally determined by contracts and fee schedules.”
Skagit Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. No. 1 v. Dep't of Revenue, 158 Wash. App. 426 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “2 ; 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 . ¶3 Medicare does not cover all costs associated with these services.”
Ben P. Rybicki v. John Robert Hartley, Elliot Hosp., 792 F.2d 260 (1st Cir. 1986). “§ 1395cc(a)(l)(A); see also 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (a). The Elliot Hospital seeks to recover from Ben Rybicki, the appellee, considerably more than the roughly $9,000 the Hospital received from Medicare for treating injuries that Rybicki sustained in an automobile accident.”
Lindholm v. Hassan, 369 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (D.S.D. 2005). “§ 1395cc and 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (a). A wage earner such as Plaintiff does contribute monetarily toward the cost of Medicare.”
Connecticut State Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Thompson, 242 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D. Conn. 2003). “” 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (b). 22 . At oral argument, the Secretary averred that the State of Connecticut, as subrogee to the beneficiary, could and should simply acquire mass information from both beneficiaries and providers and then determine, on the basis of that information, if…”
Sisters of Charity Hosp. v. Riley, 231 A.D.2d 272 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). “Medicare regulations require the provider to agree not to charge a beneficiary for "[i]npatient hospital services furnished to a beneficiary who exhausted his or her Part A benefits, if HCFA [Health Care Financing Administration] reimburses the provider for those services” (42…”
Rupp v. Premier Health Partners, 2025 Ohio 986 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “1395cc(a)(1)(A) and 42 C.F.R. 489.21(a). Individual states, including Ohio, have enacted similar laws.”
Vencor, Inc. v. Physicians Mut. Ins., 39 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999). “Under Vencor’s theory, 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (c) is a relevant regulation, because it states that a provider may not charge a beneficiary for “inpatient hospital services furnished to a beneficiary who exhausted his or her Part A benefits, if HCFA reimburses the provider for those…”
Conrad v. Perales, 92 F. Supp. 2d 175 (W.D.N.Y. 2000). “§ 1395ec(a)(1) (1994); see also 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (1999). In light of these statutory provisions, the court concludes that plaintiffs had a statutory right not to be charged for the costs of nursing home services that were covered by their Medicare benefits.”
Connecticut Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Leavitt, 428 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “See also 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (imposing same requirement on provider by regulation, though only with respect to beneficiaries).”
Skagit Pub. Hosp. v. Dept. of Revenue, 242 P.3d 909 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “2 ; 42 C.F.R. § 489.21 (2010). ¶ 3 Medicare does not cover all costs associated with these services.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— 42 C.F.R. § 489.21(a) — 3 cases
Rupp v. Premier Health Partners, 2025 Ohio 986 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “1395cc(a)(1)(A) and 42 C.F.R. 489.21(a). Individual states, including Ohio, have enacted similar laws.”
Est. of Edith Grimes v. Beaumont Health (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
Rupp v. Premier Health Partners, 2025 Ohio 985 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.