C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER D—GRANTS › PART 51c—GRANTS FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES › Subpart A—General Provisions

42 C.F.R. § 51c.110

Confidentiality

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

All information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about recipients of services shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the individual's consent except as may be required by law or as may be necessary to provide service to the individual or to provide for medical audits by the Secretary or his designee with appropriate safeguards for confidentiality of patient records. Otherwise, information may be disclosed only in summary, statistical, or other form which does not identify particular individuals.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Hale v. ARcare Inc (E.D. Ark. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hale v. ARcare Inc (E.D. Ark. 2024). “” 42 C.F.R. § 51c.110. While these provisions demonstrate the importance of patient confidentiality, they do not conclusively establish that protecting private information on computer networks is a “related function” to providing medical care.”
Ford v. United States (D.S.C. 2022). “See 42 C.F.R. § 51c.110 (entitled “Confidentiality” and providing “[a]ll information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about recipients of services shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the individual’s consent except as…”
Mixon v. United States (D.S.C. 2022). “See 42 C.F.R. § 51c.110 (entitled “Confidentiality” and providing “[a]ll information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about recipients of services shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the individual’s consent except as…”
Ford v. United States (D.S.C. 2022). “See 42 C.F.R. § 51c.110 (entitled “Confidentiality” and providing “[a]ll information as to personal facts and circumstances obtained by the project staff about recipients of services shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the individual’s consent except as…”
Marshall v. Lamoille Health Partners, Inc. (D. Vt. 2023). “” 42 C.F.R. § 51c.110. When Lamoille applies annually for deemed employee status with the Public Health Service, it attests that it has implemented such safeguards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.