42 C.F.R. § 59.11

Additional conditions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary may, with respect to any grant, impose additional conditions prior to, at the time of, or during any award, when in the Department's judgment these conditions are necessary to assure or protect advancement of the approved program, the interests of public health, or the proper use of grant funds.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–1990 · leading case: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 899 F.2d 53 (1st Cir. 1990).
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 899 F.2d 53 (1st Cir. 1990). “42 C.F.R. § 59.11 (c). Projects that receive funds under Title X are required to provide nonfed-eral “matching funds” of at least 10% of the money provided through Title X.”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Utah v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 700 F.2d 710 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “On the other hand, we find unpersuasive Planned Parenthood’s argument that imposition of a consent requirement violates the regulation protecting patient confidences, 42 C.F.R. § 59.11 (1982). S.B. 3 appears to deny family planning services supported by public funds to unmarried…”
Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Heckler, 712 F.2d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “See 42 C.F.R. § 59.11 (1982). 41 Congress was fully aware of this consistent administrative practice and in particular recognized the critical role played by the assurance of confidentiality in attracting adolescents to the clinics.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.