C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER D—GRANTS › PART 59—GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES › Subpart A—Project Grants for Family Planning Services

42 C.F.R. § 59.3

Who is eligible to apply for a family planning services grant?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any public or nonprofit private entity in a State may apply for a grant under this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Planned Parenthood KS & Mid-MO v. Brownback, 747 F.3d 814 (10th Cir. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Planned Parenthood KS & Mid-MO v. Brownback, 747 F.3d 814 (10th Cir. 2014). · cites it 10× “” 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 . The regulations detail the application process and the requirements of a Title X project.”
Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Comm'r of Indiana State Dep't of Health, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012). “Indiana pointed out that Title X’s implementing regulations contain an explicit open-eligibility requirement — “[a]ny public or nonprofit private entity in a State may apply for a grant,” 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 — while § 247c(c) and its regulatory scheme do not, see 42 C.”
Planned Parenthood of Cent. Texas v. Sanchez, 280 F. Supp. 2d 590 (W.D. Tex. 2003). · cites it 2× “” 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 . The Fifth Circuit has not decided whether regulations can provide enforceable rights under section 1983, although it noted even if regulations could create lights, the rights could not be enforceable unless the underlying statute itself created enforceable…”
Planned Parenthood of Ks & Mid-mo v. Brownback, 799 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (D. Kan. 2011). · cites it 2× “Under 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 , “[a]ny public or nonprofit entity in a State” is eligible to apply for Title X funds.”
Planned Parenthood v. Cansler, 877 F. Supp. 2d 310 (M.D.N.C. 2012). · cites it 2× “” 42 C.F.R. §§ 59.3 , 59.5. Title X funds, however, may not be used to fund abortion services.”
State of Ohio v. Xavier Becerra, 87 F.4th 759 (6th Cir. 2023). “” 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 (2021). Potential grantees submit an application that includes a description of the proposed project and how it will satisfy the Title X requirements, a budget and explanation of the amount of funds the project is requesting, and “[a] description of the…”
Planned Parenthood of Cent. Nc. v. Cansler, 804 F. Supp. 2d 482 (M.D.N.C. 2011). “” 42 CF.R. §§ 59.3, 59.5. Title X funds, however, may not be used to fund abortion services.”
Planned Parenthood Greater Memphis Region v. Dreyzehner, 853 F. Supp. 2d 724 (M.D. Tenn. 2012). “§ 300 (a); 42 C.F.R. §§ 59.3 and 59.5. Several courts have held that State law or policy that precludes private and not-for-profit entities from competing for Title X grants, violates the Supremacy Clause.”
Planned Parenthood v. Sanchez, 403 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2005). “42 C.F.R. § 59.3 . 73 . See 65 Fed.Reg. 41,270.”
State of Ohio v. Xavier Becerra (6th Cir. 2023). “” 42 C.F.R. § 59.3 (2021). Potential grantees submit an application that includes a description of the proposed project and how it will satisfy the Title X requirements, a budget and explanation of the amount of funds the project is requesting, and “[a] description of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.