42 C.F.R. § 6.3

Eligible entities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Grantees. Entities eligible for coverage under this part are public and nonprofit private entities receiving Federal funds under any of the following grant programs:

(1) Section 329 of the Act (relating to grants for migrant health centers);

(2) Section 330 of the Act (relating to grants for community health centers);

(3) Section 340 of the Act (relating to grants for health services for the homeless); and

(4) Section 340A of the Act (relating to grants for health services for residents of public housing).

(b) Subrecipients. Entities that are subrecipients of grant funds described in paragraph (a) of this section are eligible for coverage only if they provide a full range of health care services on behalf of an eligible grantee and only for those services carried out under the grant funded project.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: Anna Chronis v. United States, 932 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anna Chronis v. United States, 932 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2019). “§§ 254b & 233(g) ; see also 42 C.F.R. § 6.3 -6.6. This designation enables centers caring for underserved populations to spend their money on patient care rather than malpractice premiums.”

Bogues v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). “” See 42 C.F.R. § 6.3 (b). The Government does not dispute that subrecipients share the same "project period” as the main grantee.”

Diakite (S.D.N.Y. 2025). · cites it 2× “” 42 C.F.R. § 6.3 (b). Here, BLHC is a subrecipient of federal grant funds.”

Rowan v. SIU Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. (S.D. Ill. 2024). “§§ 254b & 233g; 42 C.F.R. § 6.3 - 6.6. See also P.W. by Woodson v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.