C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER H—HEALTH ASSESSMENTS AND HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES RELEASES AND FACILITIES › PART 93—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE POLICIES ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT › Subpart A—General

42 C.F.R. § 93.101

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to—

(a) Establish the responsibilities of HHS, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), and institutions in addressing allegations of research misconduct;

(b) Define what constitutes research misconduct in PHS-supported research;

(c) Establish the requirements for a finding of research misconduct;

(d) Define the general types of administrative actions HHS may take in response to research misconduct;

(e) Require institutions to:

(1) Develop and implement policies and procedures for reporting and addressing allegations of research misconduct covered by this part;

(2) Provide HHS with the assurances necessary to permit institutions to participate in PHS-supported research;

(f) Protect the health and safety of the public, promote the integrity of PHS-supported research and the research process, and conserve public funds.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Kumar, ph.D. v. George Washington Univ., 174 F. Supp. 3d 172 (D.D.C. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kumar, ph.D. v. George Washington Univ., 174 F. Supp. 3d 172 (D.D.C. 2016). “42 C.F.R. § 93.101 (e); see id. § 93.100 (“Research misconduct involving PHS support is contrary to the interests of the PHS and the Federal Government and to .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.