C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER H—HEALTH ASSESSMENTS AND HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES RELEASES AND FACILITIES › PART 93—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE POLICIES ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT › Subpart D—Responsibilities of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

42 C.F.R. § 93.404

Findings of research misconduct and proposed HHS administrative actions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) After completing its review of the administrative record, ORI may:

(1) Close the case without a separate ORI finding of research misconduct;

(2) Make findings of research misconduct and propose and take HHS administrative actions based on the administrative record; or

(3) Seek to settle the case.

(b) The lack of an ORI finding of research misconduct does not overturn an institution's determination that the conduct constituted professional or research misconduct warranting remediation under the institution's policy.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong (2013) illappct “42 C.F.R. §§ 93.404 to 93.405 (2005). The HHS may then impose “HHS administrative actions” including, inter alia: (1) clarification, correction or retraction of the research record; (2) letters of reprimand; (3) suspension or termination of a PHS grant; (4) restriction on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.