42 C.F.R. § 93.412

Making decisions on institutional noncompliance

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

ORI may determine an institution is not compliant with this part if the institution does not implement and follow the requirements of this part and its own research integrity assurance. In making this decision, ORI may consider, but is not limited to the following factors:

(a) Failure to establish and comply with policies and procedures under this part;

(b) Failure to respond appropriately when allegations of research misconduct arise;

(c) Failure to report to ORI all investigations and findings of research misconduct under this part;

(d) Failure to cooperate with ORI's review of research misconduct proceedings; or

(e) Other actions or omissions that have a material, adverse effect on reporting and responding to allegations of research misconduct.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: William Helm, mb.bchir v. Allison Ratterman, Phd (Ky. Ct. App. 2022).
William Helm, mb.bchir v. Allison Ratterman, Phd (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “12 42 C.F.R. § 93.412 . Again, all duties in the regulation are owed to PHS (or, as an extension, HHS).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.