C.F.R.
»
Title 42
» CHAPTER I—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER H—HEALTH ASSESSMENTS AND HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIES OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES RELEASES AND FACILITIES › PART 93—PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE POLICIES ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT › Subpart E—Opportunity To Contest ORI Findings of Research Misconduct and Proposed HHS Administrative Actions
(a) The parties to the appeal are the respondent and ORI. The investigating institution is not a party to the case unless it is a respondent.
(b) Except as otherwise limited by this subpart, the parties may:
(1) Be accompanied, represented, and advised by an attorney;
(2) Participate in any case-related conference held by the ALJ; and
(3) File motions or briefs in writing before the ALJ.
(c) The parties have no right to discovery before the ALJ.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2013–2013 · leading case:
Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong, 2013 IL App (1st) 120070, 987 N.E.2d 864.
Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong, 2013 IL App (1st) 120070, 987 N.E.2d 864.
· cites it 3× “42 C.F.R. § 93.505 (2005). During such an administrative hearing, the parties are permitted to, inter alia: (1) be represented by counsel; (2) conduct discovery; (3) present relevant evidence and cross-examine witnesses; (4) agree to a stipulation of facts; (5) file motions in…”
Brodie v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 951 F. Supp. 2d 108 (D.D.C. 2013).
“20] at 2-4 (citing, inter alia, 42 C.F.R. § 93.505 ). This argument is waived because it was raised for the first time in Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.