45 C.F.R. § 1355.39

Administrative and judicial review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A title IV-E agency determined not to be in substantial conformity with titles IV-B and IV-E plan requirements, or a title IV-E agency or an entity in violation of section 471(a)(18) of the Act:

(a) May appeal, pursuant to 45 CFR part 16, the final determination and any subsequent withholding of, or reduction in, funds to the HHS Departmental Appeals Board within 60 days after receipt of a notice of nonconformity described in § 1355.36(e)(1) of this part, or receipt of a notice of noncompliance by ACF as described in § 1355.38(a)(3) of this part; and

(b) Will have the opportunity to obtain judicial review of an adverse decision of the Departmental Appeals Board within 60 days after the title IV-E agency or entity receives notice of the decision by the Board. Appeals of adverse Department Appeals Board decisions must be made to the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the principal or headquarters office of the agency responsible for administering the program is located.

(c) The procedure described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will not apply to a finding that a title IV-E agency or an entity has been determined to be in violation of section 471(a)(18) which is based on a judicial decision.

[65 FR 4083, Jan. 25, 2000, as amended at 77 FR 932, Jan. 6, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2015 · leading case: Cal. All. of Child & Fam. Serv. v. Allenby, 589 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2009).
Cal. All. of Child & Fam. Serv. v. Allenby, 589 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2009). “, 45 C.F.R. §§ 1355.39 , 1356.71(c)(5). And it makes sense that compliance cannot, as a practical matter, invariably be strict.”
Connor B. ex rel. Vigurs v. Patrick, 985 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D. Mass. 2013). “at 1021 (holding that the payment of 80% of foster care costs “runs afoul of the [AACWA’s] mandate”).”
California All. of Child & Fam. Servs. v. Allenby, 589 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “, 45 C.F.R. §§ 1355.39 , 1356.71(c)(5). And it makes sense that compliance cannot, as a practical matter, invariably be strict.”
Ah Chong v. McManaman, 154 F. Supp. 3d 1043 (D. Haw. 2015). “, 45 C.F.R. §§ 1355.39 , 1356.71(c)(5). And it makes sense that compliance cannot, as a practical matter, invariably be strict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.