(a) General. In providing health, welfare, or other social services or benefits, a recipient may not, on the basis of handicap:
(1) Deny a qualified person with a disability these benefits or services;
(2) Afford a qualified person with a disability an opportunity to receive benefits or services that is not equal to that offered persons without disabilities;
(3) Provide a qualified person with a disability with benefits or services that are not as effective (as defined in § 84.4(b)) as the benefits or services provided to others;
(4) Provide benefits or services in a manner that limits or has the effect of limiting the participation of qualified persons with disabilities; or
(5) Provide different or separate benefits or services to persons with disabilities except where necessary to provide qualified persons with disabilities with benefits and services that are as effective as those provided to others.
(b) Notice. A recipient that provides notice concerning benefits or services or written material concerning waivers of rights or consent to treatment shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that qualified persons with disabilities, including those with impaired sensory or speaking skills, are not denied effective notice because of their disability.
[42 FR 22677, May 4, 1977, as amended at 89 FR 40187, May 9, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Loeffler v. Staten Island University Hospital (2009)
ca2 · cites it 4×
“" 45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (c). Additionally, a recipient hospital with fifteen or more employees is required to "provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, where necessary to afford such persons an equal opportunity to benefit from…”
Davis v. Flexman (1999)
ohsd · cites it 12×
“Specifically, 45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (d) states: “(d) Auxiliary aids.”
Alexander v. Choate (1985)
scotus · cites it 2×
“” 45 CFR §84.52 (a)(3)(1984). The regulations also prohibit a recipient of federal funding from adopting “criteria or methods of administration that *305 have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the recipient’s…”
Nordwall v. PHC-LAS Cruces, Inc. (2013)
nmd · cites it 7×
“Nordwall argues that 45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (d) defines Memorial Medical’s Rehabilitation Act obligations, providing that certain healthcare providers who receive federal funding “shall provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills…”
Proctor v. Prince George's Hospital Center (1998)
mdd · cites it 2×
“45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (a)(2)-(4). As a recipient of federal funds that employs fifteen or more people, PGHC must also “provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, where necessary to afford such persons an equal opportunity to…”
— 45 C.F.R. § 84.52(a) — 1 case
Nordwall v. PHC-LAS Cruces, Inc. (2013)
nmd
“Nordwall argues that 45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (d) defines Memorial Medical’s Rehabilitation Act obligations, providing that certain healthcare providers who receive federal funding “shall provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills…”
— 45 C.F.R. § 84.52(d) — 1 case
Nordwall v. PHC-LAS Cruces, Inc. (2013)
nmd
“Nordwall argues that 45 C.F.R. § 84.52 (d) defines Memorial Medical’s Rehabilitation Act obligations, providing that certain healthcare providers who receive federal funding “shall provide appropriate auxiliary aids to persons with impaired sensory, manual or speaking skills…”
— 45 C.F.R. § 84.52(d)(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.