48 C.F.R. § 15.301
15.301 [Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Labat-Anderson Inc. v. United States
Labat-Anderson Inc. v. United States (2001)
“404 (AR at 287), technical proposals would be rated in accordance with criteria defined by 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 (AR at 837), and debriefing would be conducted pursuant to 48 C.”
Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United States (2001)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 . As one pair of commentators *72 has noted, such deficiencies can include "failures to meet specifications, failures to submit information, or questionable technical or management approaches.”
Jwk International Corporation v. United States, and Ltm Inc. (2002)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 (2001). The Navy had estimated that the contract would cost $164,206,050, and JWK’s adjusted bid was $167,191,517.”
Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United States (2000)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 .... Plaintiff has not convinced the court that the disadvantages which were not shared with Cube meet these somewhat stringent definitions.”
OTI America, Inc. v. United States (2005)
“404 and would be rated regarding technical aspects in accord with 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 . After evaluating bids from four offerors who each held FSS contracts with GSA, INS decided to enter into a Blanket Purchase Agreement with a contractor other than the protestor.”
JWK International Corp. v. United States (2001)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 (2000); AR 52. Under that provision a “significant weakness” in a proposal is defined as “a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.”
Cube Corp. v. United States (2000)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 15.301 . A “deficiency” is defined as “a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.