48 C.F.R. § 52.222-17
52.222-17 [Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2021 · leading case: Sims v. United States
Sims v. United States (2016)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 52.222-17 . However, even if the contract required her to give Mr.”
Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education v. United States (2017)
“ld be furnishing certain property to the contract awardee for use as part of the contract, which the awardee would be responsible for maintaining, AR at 239-40, 564-84 (listing property the government would furnish to the awardee), and because the awardee was obligated to offer…”
Ideogenics LLC v. United States (2018)
“48 C.F.R. § 52.222-17 (b). 20 Ideogenics did not provide a citation to the Administrative Record to support this argument.”
Technica LLC v. United States (2019)
“AR 687; 48 C.F.R. § 52.222-17 (2014). Practically applied, this regulation will result in the final awardee, be it ASM or Technica, performing the contract with a workforce almost entirely comprised of ISS employees.”
Vertex Aerospace, LLC v. United States (2019)
“222-17 (b) provides that “[t]he Contractor and its subcontractors shall, except as otherwise provided herein, in good faith offer those service employees employed under the predecessor contract whose employment will be terminated as a result of award of this contract or the…”
Just in Time Staffing v. United States (2019)
“]” 48 C.F.R. § 52.222-17 (i). Therefore, the plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to plausibly suggest that negotiating with the prospective union was work performed beyond the contract requirements, because the contract required plaintiff to comply with its statutory…”
Paugh v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2020)
“10 (citing Executive Order 13495, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts, 74 FR 6103 ; Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 CFR 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers; McNamara-O’ Hara Service Contract Act, 41 U.”
Paugh v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)
“10 (citing Executive Order 13495, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts (“Executive Order 13495”), 74 FR 6103 ; Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 CFR 52.222-17, ! Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers; McNamara-O’ Hara Service Contract Act, 41 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.