49 C.F.R. § 1.48

Office of the Chief Information Officer

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the principal information technology (IT), cyber security, privacy, and records management advisor to the Secretary, and is the final authority on these matters within the Department. The Office of the CIO supports the Organizational Excellence Strategic Goal by providing leadership on all matters associated with the Department's IT portfolio. The CIO participates with each Administrator in the hiring decisions and performance reviews of the Operating Administrations' CIOs.

[82 FR 19193, Apr. 26, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases, 1972–2009 · leading case: Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999).
Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999). · cites it 2× “§ 31136 (a)(3); 49 CFR § 1.48 (aa) (1998). [2] Visual acuity has a number of components but most commonly refers to "the ability to determine the presence of or to distinguish between more than one identifying feature in a visible target.”
City of Cleveland v. Ohio, 508 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 2007). “§ 104 ; 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (b). The FHWA is an agency within the United States Department of Transportation.”
Prof'l Drivers Council, John Torbet, & David Gaibis v. Bureau of Motor Carrier Saf., & United States of Am., 706 F.2d 1216 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “§ 1655 (f)(3)(B) (1976); 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (f) (1982). The Federal Highway Administrator’s responsibilities for motor carrier safety are, in turn, delegated to the Director of the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety.”
Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Limmer, 299 S.W.3d 78 (Tex. 2009). “214(b)(2) or on any project where Federal-aid funds participate in the installation of the devices are to include automatic gates with flashing light signals when one or more of the following conditions exist: *83 "(A) Multiple main line railroad tracks.”
Stong v. Freeman Truck Line, Inc., 456 So. 2d 698 (Miss. 1984). “Authority to augment the regulations has been transferred within the Department of Transportation pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §§ 1.48 and 301.60 (1983). Within the Department of Transportation these regulations are administered by the Federal Highway Administration.”
Advocates for High. & Auto Saf. v. Fed. High. Admin., 28 F.3d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (aa) (1993). The current regulation establishing the vision standard for drivers of commercial motor vehicles (“CMV”) engaged in interstate commerce requires, in part, that such drivers have “distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without…”
Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Tiemann, 414 F. Supp. 215 (D.D.C. 1976). “49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (b)(14)(ii). The case is currently before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative to dismiss, on all four counts of plaintiffs’ complaint.”
Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency v. King, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7290 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991). “37 (1983); 49 C.F.R. Section 1.48(b)(21), (c)(ll)(1982).”
Radio Ass'n on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. Frank Figuero v. United States Dep't of Transp., Fed. High. Admin., 47 F.3d 794 (6th Cir. 1995). “§ 104 (c)(2); 49 C.F.R. 1.48(f), (aa). *798 B. Regulation of Radar Detectors Radar detectors have been the subject of a great amount of controversy and proposed legislation.”
Auto. Club of New York, Inc. v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 706 F. Supp. 264 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “” 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (i)(1). On April 2, 1987, Congress enacted the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1987, 33 U.”
Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., 531 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1976). “The Secretary, in turn, has delegated this authority to the Federal Highway Administrator (49 C.F.R. 1.48), and the Administrator has redelegated it to the Director, Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety ( 35 F.”
Monnier v. United States Dep't of Transp., 465 F. Supp. 718 (E.D. Wis. 1979). “49 CFR 1.48(f). The current diabetes rule was originally promulgated on April 22, 1977, based upon an analysis by the Federal Highway Administrator.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.48(b)(21) — 1 case
Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency v. King, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7290 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991). “37 (1983); 49 C.F.R. Section 1.48(b)(21), (c)(ll)(1982).”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.48(f) — 2 cases
Radio Ass'n on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. Frank Figuero v. United States Dep't of Transp., Fed. High. Admin., 47 F.3d 794 (6th Cir. 1995). “§ 104 (c)(2); 49 C.F.R. 1.48(f), (aa). *798 B. Regulation of Radar Detectors Radar detectors have been the subject of a great amount of controversy and proposed legislation.”
Monnier v. United States Dep't of Transp., 465 F. Supp. 718 (E.D. Wis. 1979). “49 CFR 1.48(f). The current diabetes rule was originally promulgated on April 22, 1977, based upon an analysis by the Federal Highway Administrator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.