49 C.F.R. § 1.48
Office of the Chief Information Officer
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the principal information technology (IT), cyber security, privacy, and records management advisor to the Secretary, and is the final authority on these matters within the Department. The Office of the CIO supports the Organizational Excellence Strategic Goal by providing leadership on all matters associated with the Department's IT portfolio. The CIO participates with each Administrator in the hiring decisions and performance reviews of the Operating Administrations' CIOs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases, 1972–2009 · leading case: Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg
Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg (1999)
“§ 31136 (a)(3); 49 CFR § 1.48 (aa) (1998). [2] Visual acuity has a number of components but most commonly refers to "the ability to determine the presence of or to distinguish between more than one identifying feature in a visible target.”
City of Cleveland v. Ohio (2007)
“§ 104 ; 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (b). The FHWA is an agency within the United States Department of Transportation.”
Professional Drivers Council, John Torbet, and David Gaibis v. Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety, and United States of Amer (1983)
“§ 1655 (f)(3)(B) (1976); 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (f) (1982). The Federal Highway Administrator’s responsibilities for motor carrier safety are, in turn, delegated to the Director of the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety.”
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Limmer (2009)
“214(b)(2) or on any project where Federal-aid funds participate in the installation of the devices are to include automatic gates with flashing light signals when one or more of the following conditions exist: *83 "(A) Multiple main line railroad tracks.”
Stong v. Freeman Truck Line, Inc. (1984)
“Authority to augment the regulations has been transferred within the Department of Transportation pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §§ 1.48 and 301.60 (1983). Within the Department of Transportation these regulations are administered by the Federal Highway Administration.”
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety v. Federal Highway Administration (1994)
“49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (aa) (1993). The current regulation establishing the vision standard for drivers of commercial motor vehicles (“CMV”) engaged in interstate commerce requires, in part, that such drivers have “distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without…”
Center for Auto Safety v. Tiemann (1976)
“49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (b)(14)(ii). The case is currently before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative to dismiss, on all four counts of plaintiffs’ complaint.”
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. King (1991)
“37 (1983); 49 C.F.R. Section 1.48(b)(21), (c)(ll)(1982).”
Radio Association on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. Frank Figuero v. United States Department of Transportation, Federal (1995)
“§ 104 (c)(2); 49 C.F.R. 1.48(f), (aa). *798 B. Regulation of Radar Detectors Radar detectors have been the subject of a great amount of controversy and proposed legislation.”
Automobile Club of New York, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (1989)
“” 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (i)(1). On April 2, 1987, Congress enacted the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1987, 33 U.”
Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. (1976)
“The Secretary, in turn, has delegated this authority to the Federal Highway Administrator (49 C.F.R. 1.48), and the Administrator has redelegated it to the Director, Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety ( 35 F.”
Monnier v. United States Department of Transportation (1979)
“49 CFR 1.48(f). The current diabetes rule was originally promulgated on April 22, 1977, based upon an analysis by the Federal Highway Administrator.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.48(b)(21) — 1 case
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. King (1991)
“37 (1983); 49 C.F.R. Section 1.48(b)(21), (c)(ll)(1982).”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.48(f) — 2 cases
Radio Association on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. Frank Figuero v. United States Department of Transportation, Federal (1995)
“§ 104 (c)(2); 49 C.F.R. 1.48(f), (aa). *798 B. Regulation of Radar Detectors Radar detectors have been the subject of a great amount of controversy and proposed legislation.”
Monnier v. United States Department of Transportation (1979)
“49 CFR 1.48(f). The current diabetes rule was originally promulgated on April 22, 1977, based upon an analysis by the Federal Highway Administrator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.