C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER XII—TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER C—CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY › PART 1560—SECURE FLIGHT PROGRAM › Subpart C—Passenger Redress

49 C.F.R. § 1560.201

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart applies to individuals who believe they have been improperly or unfairly delayed or prohibited from boarding an aircraft or entering a sterile area as a result of the Secure Flight program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: Ghedi v. Mayorkas, 16 F.4th 456 (5th Cir. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ghedi v. Mayorkas, 16 F.4th 456 (5th Cir. 2021). “12 49 C.F.R. § 1560.201 . 13 § 1560.205(d). 14 As we discuss more fully below, Ghedi is appealing the district court’s dismissal of his complaint.”
Kovac v. Wray, 363 F. Supp. 3d 721 (N.D. Tex. 2019). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 - .207. The TSA promulgated regulations governing the DHS TRIP process and allowing travelers to initiate the redress process by submitting a redress inquiry form.”
Saeb Mokdad v. Loretta E. Lynch, 804 F.3d 807 (6th Cir. 2015). “49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 -.207. Under § 1560.”
Elhady v. Piehota, 303 F. Supp. 3d 453 (E.D. Va. 2017). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 - 207. If the traveler's name is a match or near match with a name on the Watch List, "TSA, in coordination with the TSC and other appropriate Federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies, if necessary, will review all the documentation and…”
Kovac v. Wray, 109 F.4th 331 (5th Cir. 2024). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 , .205. Because of security concerns, the Government’s policy is to neither confirm nor deny a person’s Selectee List status; those on the No-Fly List will be apprised of their status and may ob- tain judicial review.”
Tanvir v. Lynch, 128 F. Supp. 3d 756 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). “See 49 C.F.R. § 1560.201 et seq. The TSA is also required to maintain records for individuals whose information has been corrected through its redress process.”
Crooker v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 323 F. Supp. 3d 148 (D.D.C. 2018). “49 C.F.R. § 1560.201 . TSA promulgated regulations governing the DHS TRIP process and allowing travelers to initiate the redress process by submitting a redress inquiry form.”
Salloum v. Kable (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 – 1560.207. As another Judge on this Court has explained, the DHS TRIP process works as follows: After a redress inquiry form is submitted, the TSA, in coordination with the TSC and other appropriate Federal law enforcement or intelligence agencies, if…”
Kovac v. Wray (5th Cir. 2024). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1560.201 , .205. Because of security concerns, the Government’s policy is to neither confirm nor deny a person’s Selectee List status; those on the No-Fly List will be apprised of their status and may ob- tain judicial review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.