49 C.F.R. § 568.3
Definitions
All terms that are defined in the Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority are used as defined therein. The term “bumper” has the meaning assigned to it in Title I of the Cost Savings Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority. The definitions contained in 49 CFR part 567 apply to this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1972–1992 · leading case: Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston, 835 S.W.2d 576 (Tenn. 1992).
Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston, 835 S.W.2d 576 (Tenn. 1992). “” 49 C.F.R. § 568.3 (1991). An “incomplete vehicle” is defined as: as assemblage consisting, as a minimum, of frame and chassis structure, power train, steering system, suspension system, and braking system, to the extent that those systems are to be part of the completed…”
Rex Chainbelt, Inc. v. Claude S. Brinegar, Sec'y, Dep't of Transp., 511 F.2d 1215 (7th Cir. 1975). “6 (b) required Rex, as the final stage manufacturer ( 49 C.F.R. § 568.3 ), to certify that the entire vehicle — chassis-cab and mixer — conformed to all applicable federal motor safety standards.”
Nat'l Truck Equip. Ass'n v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., 919 F.2d 1148 (6th Cir. 1990). “” 49 C.F.R. § 568.3 (1989). Chassis-cabs constitute a distinct subset of incomplete vehicles.”
Rex Chainbelt, Inc. v. Volpe, 486 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1973). “” 49 CFR § 568.3 . The manufacturer of the chassis-cab, be it Ford, General Motors, or any other concern, is therefore an “incomplete vehicle manufacturer.”
Rex Chainbelt Inc. v. Volpe, 342 F. Supp. 281 (E.D. Wis. 1972). “Under 49 C.F.R. § 568.3 the plaintiff is denominated a “final-stage manufacturer” because it “performs such manufacturing operations on an incomplete vehicle that [the incomplete vehicle] becomes a completed vehicle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.