C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER XI—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › PART 1230—PORK PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION › Subpart A—Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order

7 C.F.R. § 1230.88

Patents, copyrights, inventions, and publications

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any patents, copyrights, trademarks, inventions, or publications developed through the use of funds collected under the provisions of this subpart shall be the property of the United States Government as represented by the Board, and shall, along with any rents, royalties, residual payments, or other income from the rental, sale, leasing, franchising, or other uses of such patents, copyrights, inventions, or publications inure to the benefit of the Board as income and be subject to the same fiscal, budget, and audit controls as other funds of the Board. Upon termination of this subpart, § 1230.85 shall apply to determine disposition of all such property.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2013–2018 · leading case: Humane Soc'y of the U.S. v. Perdue, 290 F. Supp. 3d 5 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Humane Soc'y of the U.S. v. Perdue, 290 F. Supp. 3d 5 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “at 19-23, citing 7 C.F.R. § 1230.88 . But plaintiffs did not challenge the ownership of the trademarks in their lawsuit, nor do they dispute that the trademarks were registered to NPPC and owned by NPPC after "the Separation" the organizations in 2001.”
Humane Soc'y of the United States v. Vilsack, 19 F. Supp. 3d 24 (D.D.C. 2013). “¶ 33, citing 7 C.F.R. § 1230.88 . So they argue that before NPPC can re-license or re-sell the trademarks, it must account for the value added to them through checkoff promotions and credit that value back to the pork producers.”
Humane Soc'y of the United States v. Perdue (D.D.C. 2018). “at 19–23, citing 7 C.F.R. § 1230.88 . But plaintiffs did not challenge the ownership of the trademarks in their lawsuit, nor do they dispute that the trademarks were registered to NPPC and owned by NPPC after “the Separation” the organizations in 2001.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.