C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER XIV—COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER B—LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS › PART 1435—SUGAR PROGRAM › Subpart A—General Provisions

7 C.F.R. § 1435.1

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The regulations in this part specify the terms and conditions under which the Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will administer the Sugar Program for the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to:

(1) Make loans and enter agreements with eligible processors,

(2) Collect data from sugarcane processors, sugar beet processors, cane refiners, and importers of sugar, syrup, and molasses,

(3) Administer sugar marketing allotments, and

(4) Administer an inventory disposition program to sell CCC inventory to bioenergy producers and exchange CCC inventory for processor reductions in production or certificates of quota entry.

(b) [Reserved]

[67 FR 54928, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 15363, Apr. 6, 2009; 80 FR 141, Jan. 2, 2015; 91 FR 42333, July 9, 2026]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Amalgamated Sugar Co. LLC v. Vilsack, 563 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Amalgamated Sugar Co. LLC v. Vilsack, 563 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2009). “7 C.F.R. § 1435.1 . Under the program, Congress directed the Secretary to make initial allocations based upon historical beet sugar production levels for the 1998 through 2000 crop years.”
Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Johanns (9th Cir. 2009). “7 C.F.R. § 1435.1 . Under the program, Congress directed the Secretary to make initial allo- cations based upon historical beet sugar production levels for the 1998 through 2000 crop years.”
Amalgamated Sugar v. Co. Johanns (9th Cir. 2009). “7 C.F.R. § 1435.1 . Under the program, Con- gress directed the Secretary to make initial allocations based upon historical beet sugar production levels for the 1998 through 2000 crop years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.