C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER V—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER B—IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS › PART 1208—PROCEDURES FOR ASYLUM AND WITHHOLDING OF REMOVAL › Subpart A—Asylum and Withholding of Removal

8 C.F.R. § 1208.19

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2011 · leading case: Myron Kukalo v. Eric Holder, Jr., 744 F.3d 395 (6th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Myron Kukalo v. Eric Holder, Jr., 744 F.3d 395 (6th Cir. 2011). “14 (b), (c); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.19 ). In L-K- the BIA specifically noted that its “holding is narrow and limited to the factual scenario at issue in this case,” specifically “situations in which an asylum application was filed while the alien was in nonimmigrant status, the…”
L-k, 23 I. & N. Dec. 677 (BIA 2004). “14 (b), (c) (2004); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1208.19 (2004) (describing the various types of “decisions” of an asylum officer, including one to “refer an asylum application”).”
Myron Kukalo v. Eric Holder, Jr. (6th Cir. 2011). “14 (b), (c); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.19 ). In L-K-, the BIA specifically noted that its “holding is narrow and limited to the factual scenario at issue in this case,” specifically “situations in which an asylum application was filed while the alien was in nonimmigrant status, the…”
Khori v. Atty Gen USA, 269 F. App'x 166 (3rd Cir. 2008). “” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.19 (a)(2). Petitioner first contends that neither the IJ nor the BIA provided any meaningful analysis of his CAT claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.