8 C.F.R. § 241.31
Final order of deportation
An order of deportation becomes final in accordance with 8 CFR 1241.31.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1997–2004 · leading case: J. Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 246 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 2001).
J. Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 246 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 2001). “8 C.F.R. § 241.31 . Because deportation proceedings were initiated against Torres-Aguilar on January 24,1996, and since a final order of deportation was issued on December 21, 1998, the transitional rules apply to Torres-Aguilar’s case.”
Mazen Al Najjar v. John Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2001). “See 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2001) (explaining that an order of deportation 'shall become final upon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals,’ among other things).”
Youri K. Koliada v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 259 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. 2001). “8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2001). As to cases in which a final deportation order was filed after October 30, 1996, and which were pending before April 1, 1997, the Reform Act’s transitional rules apply.”
Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 828 (11th Cir. 2004). “” 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2002). Because the Board did not conclusively dismiss Adefemi’s appeal until its October 4, 2000, decision, its earlier decisions in 1997 and 1999 were not final orders.”
Estanislao S. Mapoy v. William Carroll, Dist. Dir., United States Dep't of Just., Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 185 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1999). “We note that the INS had a credible basis to argue that the Voluntary Departure Order constituted the final administrative order for purposes of determining the timeliness of Ma-poy’s Motion to Reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (1998), but due to our disposition on jurisdictional…”
Mihai Fedorca v. Brian Perryman, Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 197 F.3d 236 (7th Cir. 1999). “See 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (1999); 8 C.F.R. § 241.”
Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2003). “” 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2002). Because the Board did not conclusively dismiss Adefe-mi’s appeal until its October 4, 2000 decision, its earlier decisions in 1997 and 1999 were not final orders.”
Goolcharan, 23 I. & N. Dec. 5 (BIA 2001). “8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2000); see also section 101(a)(47) of the Act, 8 U.”
Kalaw v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 133 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 1997). “Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 , a deportation order becomes final "upon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals, upon waiver of appeal, or upon expiration of the time allotted for an appeal when no appeal is taken; or, if such an order is issued by the Board…”
Guadalupe-Cruz v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 2001). “See 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (stating that “an order of deportation .”
Gutierrez-Perez v. Fasano, 37 F. Supp. 2d 1166 (S.D. Cal. 1999). “4 (“Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 , a deportation order becomes final ‘upon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals .”
Fedaa Al Najjar v. John Ashcroft, 257 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2001). “See 8 C.F.R. § 241.31 (2001) (explaining that an order of deportation “shall become final upon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals,” among other things).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.