Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-301 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part 3 shall be known and may be cited as the "Dispute Resolution Act".

Source: L. 83: Entire part added, p. 624, § 1, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Custom Homes, LLC v. Westover, 2020 COA 178 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Custom Homes, LLC v. Westover, 2020 COA 178 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “First, relying on the Dispute Resolution Act (the Act), sections 13-22-301 to -313, C.R.S. 2020, and on Yaekle, they contend that much of the evidence presented at the hearing was inadmissible because it revealed mediation communications.”

Yaekle v. Andrews, 169 P.3d 196 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “Colorado's Dispute Resolution Act, § 13-22-301, et seq., C.R.S.2006, sets out the requirements for a settlement agreement to be judicially enforceable.”

Larson v. Larson, 687 F. App'x 695 (10th Cir. 2017). “are confidential by this agreement and the Colorado Dispute Resolution Act, C.R.S. 13-22-301, et[.] seq.,” 8 the lawsuit was filed in Wyoming.”

In re the Marriage of Rivera, 300 P.3d 994 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013). “The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), sections 13-22-301 to -230, C.R.S.2012, encourages the settlement of disputes through arbitration.”

Huizar v. Allstate Ins. Co., 932 P.2d 839 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997). “Colorado has also adopted the Dispute Resolution Act, § 13-22-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”

Sterling Constr. Mgmt., LLC v. Steadfast Ins., 280 F.R.D. 576 (D. Colo. 2011). “Might this include informal settlement negotiations designed at least in part to avoid litigation and its attendant expense? Is it necessarily limited to a formal proceeding conducted by a professional such as the proceedings described in Colorado’s Dispute Resolution Act,…”

Rifle Onion Co. LLC v. Hellman (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 4× “Defendants rely on federal common law and Colorado’s Dispute Resolution Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-301 , et seq., to support their argument that a mediator’s privilege 5 The Engagement Letter complements the MOU’s severability provision.”

CBD970, LLC v. Labyrinth Holdings, Inc. (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 4× “Defendants rely on federal common law and Colorado’s Dispute Resolution Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-301 , et seq., to support their argument that a mediator’s privilege applies in this context.”

GLN COMPLIANCE v. Aviation Manual Solutions, 203 P.3d 595 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). “The Act's Provisions The Act, sections 13-22-301 to -313, C.R.S.2008, "governs the use of mediation as an alternative to litigation.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.