Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-1-101
Short titles
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) This title shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Commercial Code". (b) This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Commercial Code - General Provisions".
Source: L. 2006: Entire article R&RE, p. 457, § 1, effective September 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 4-1-101 as it existed prior to 2006.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc. (1984)
“Section 4-2-607(3)(a) of the Uniform Commercial Code [§§ 4-1-101 to 4-11-102, 2 C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.”
United States Ex Rel. Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. (1981)
“The statute of frauds requires contracts for the sale of goods for $500 or more to be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.”
Glover v. Innis (2011)
“In order to resolve this issue, we must construe section 4-3-604 and related provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, sections 4-1-101 through 4-9.7-109, C.R.S.”
Leica Geosystems, Inc. v. L.W.S. Leasing, Inc. (2012)
“See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 4-1-101 et seq.; Ga. Code Ann.”
Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd. v. World Bus. Lenders, LLC (In re Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd.) (2019)
“§ 4-1-101 et seq. , is designed to "simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions .”
Isaac v. American Heritage Bank & Trust Co. (1984)
“), codified in Colorado at sections 4-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. and 1982 Supp.”
Friedman & Son, Inc. v. Safeway Stores, Inc. (1985)
“Friedman next contends that even if the May 1982 contract was unambiguous, the Uniform Commercial Code, § 4-1-101, et seq., C.R.S., required the trial court to consider the prior course of dealing between the parties.”
Thomas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Thomas) (2012)
“has been adopted in most jurisdictions, including both Colorado (Colo.Rev. Stat. §§ 4-1-101 to 4-11-102) and Oklahoma (Okla.”
Ranchers & Farmers Livestock Auc. Co. v. Honey (1976)
“Sections 4-1-101, et seq., C.R.S.1973, and N.”
Colorado Leasing Corp. v. Borquez (1986)
“They claim the trial court erred in holding that the lease was not a security agreement under the Uniform Commercial Code § 4-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. (U.C.C.), to which the notice of sale provisions of § 4-9-504(3), C.”
Browning Enterprise v. Rex Iron & MacHine Products Co., Inc. (2007)
“(2005) and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-1-101 et seq. (2006).”
Anderson Boneless Beef, Inc. v. Sunshine Health Care Center, Inc. (1994)
“At the hearing, Anderson relied on the Uniform Commercial Code, § 4-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1992 Repl.Vol.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.