Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 4

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-204

Formation in general

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract. (2) An agreement sufficient to constitute a contract for sale may be found even though the moment of its making is undetermined. (3) Even though one or more terms are left open, a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy.

Source: L. 65: p. 1303, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-204.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–2012 · leading case: Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Nielsons, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Nielsons, Inc. (1986) cod · cites it 2× “” See also Colo.Rev.Stat. § 4-2-204. Wesco’s offer, then, disclaimed liability for incidental and consequential damages.”
Nations Enterprises, Inc. v. PROCESS EQMT. (1978) coloctapp · cites it 2× “See § 4-2-204, C.R.S.1973. Thus, since the pumps which were acceptable were shipped to Nations and accepted by it, the contract for their sale, although not in writing, is enforceable, and Process is entitled to the purchase price.”
Leica Geosystems, Inc. v. L.W.S. Leasing, Inc. (2012) cod · cites it 2× “See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 4-2-204(1) (“[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-204(1) — 1 case
Leica Geosystems, Inc. v. L.W.S. Leasing, Inc. (2012) cod “See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 4-2-204(1) (“[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.