Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-1-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Articles 1 to 9 of this title shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Consumer Credit Code", referred to in said articles as the "code".

Source: L. 2000: Entire article R&RE, p. 1178, § 1, effective July 1. Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 5-1-101, as it existed prior to 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Dikeou v. Dikeou, 928 P.2d 1286 (Colo. 1996).
Dikeou v. Dikeou, 928 P.2d 1286 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 4× “" [4] Section 5-1-101, 2 C.R.S. (1992), specifically states that the U.”
Sanchez v. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Larimer, 624 P.2d 1314 (Colo. 1981). · cites it 2× “, and of the Colorado “Uniform Consumer Credit Code,” section 5-1-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973; wrongful repossession and conversion; intentional misrepresentation; breach of implied warranty of merchantability, section 4-2-314, C.”
Copeland v. MBNA Am., N.A., 820 F. Supp. 537 (D. Colo. 1993). · cites it 2× “Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 5-1-101 to 5-13-105 (1992 Repl.”
Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd. v. World Bus. Lenders, LLC (In re Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd.), 603 B.R. 41 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2019). · cites it 2× “promissory note , or other instrument of writing may stipulate therein for the payment of a greater or higher rate of interest than eight percent per annum, but not exceeding forty-five percent per annum , and any such stipulation may be enforced in any court of competent…”
Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A., 653 A.2d 640 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “1994); Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 5-1-101 to 5-9-103 (1973 & Supp.”
Tulips Investments, LLC v. State of Colorado ex rel.Suthers, Colorado Attorney Gen., 2015 CO 1 (Colo. 2015). “1 Tulips Investments, LLC ("Tulips") is *1129 a Delaware corporation the State of Colorado contends is conducting a loan business within the State of Colorado in violation of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (the "UCCC" or the "Code"), §§ 5-1-101 ef seq., C.R.S. (2014), and the…”
Roberts v. People, 130 P.3d 1005 (Colo. 2006). “See §§ 5-1-101 to 5-13-105, C.R.S. (2005). 7 *1011 CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.”
Oasis Legal Fin. Grp. v. Coffman, Colorado Attorney Gen., 2015 CO 63 (Colo. 2015). · cites it 2× “§§ 5-1-101 to 5-13-103, C.R.S. (2015). We conclude they are.”
Cook v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 564 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D. Colo. 2008). · cites it 2× “Colo.Rev.Stat. § 5-1-101. The prejudgment interest statute is found in Article 12 of Title 5.”
Colorado v. W. Sky Fin., L.L.C., 845 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Colo. 2011). · cites it 2× “Webb seeking injunctive relief and damages for alleged violations of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code, C.R.S. §§ 5-1-101 et seq. and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.”
State ex rel. Salazar v. Cash Now Store, Inc., 31 P.3d 161 (Colo. 2001). “In 1998, the state Administrator ("Administrator") of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code ("UCCC"), § 5-1-101 to -9-103, 2 C.R.S. (2000), determined that Respondent, The Cash Now Store, Inc.”
State Ex Rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance & Preferred Cash Loans, 205 P.3d 389 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). “Initial Discovery In January 2005, the Attorney General, employing the UCCC, sections 5-1-101 to - *395 9-103, C.R.S.2007, and the CCPA, sections 6-1-101 to -116, C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.