State v. Owens, 667 A.2d 554 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Owens, 667 A.2d 554 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“there is no authority for the proposition that a defendant's status as the owner of commercial property imposes a different, and higher, duty of care than that imposed on owners of private or ct page 3019 residential property”
24 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Croom v. Duchess Hamburger of Stratford, No. Cv94 031 06 86 (Mar. 7, 1998) (connsuperct, 1998-03-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Croom v. Duchess Hamburger of Stratford, No. Cv94 031 06 86 (Mar. 7, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
there is no authority for the proposition that a defendant's status as the owner of commercial property imposes a different, and higher, duty of care than that imposed on owners of private or ct page 3019 residential property
discussed Cited "see" Belevich v. Renaissance I, LLC.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co., 38 Conn. App. 844 , 848–50, 664 A.2d 791 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 927 , 667 A.2d 553 (1995). 8 Cf. Solazzo v. New York City Transit Authority, 6 N.Y.3d 734, 735 , 843 N.E.2d 748 , 810 N.Y.S.2d 121 (2005) (applying New York law) (‘‘A property owner will not be held liable in negligence for a plaintiff’s injuries sustained as the result of an icy condition occurring during an ongoing storm or for a reasonable time thereafter . . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ocasio v. Verdura Construction, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
The doctrine pertains ‘‘to the duty to protect invitees upon one’s property when a snowstorm is in progress at the time of [a] plaintiff’s alleged injury.’’ Belevich v. Renaissance I, LLC, 207 Conn. App. 119 , 125, 261 A.3d 1 (2021); see also Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co., 38 Conn. App. 844, 849 , 664 A.2d 791 (ongoing storm doctrine pertains to landowner or other inviter’s ‘‘duty of care with respect to others’’), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 927 , 667 A.2d 553 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Wright
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 371 (1991); see also State v. Owens, 39 Conn. App. 45, 49-50 , 663 A.2d 1108 (unpreserved claim regarding factually insufficient theory of culpability presented in alternative is not of constitutional magnitude and consequently fails on second prong of Golding), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 927 , 667 A.2d 554 (1995). 7 The judgment is affirmed.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RONALD OWENS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 6, 1995.
667 A.2d 554
Ronald G. Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Brigid Donohue, special public defender, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 45 (AC 12777), is denied.