green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Alvarez
But see State v. Johnson, 76 Conn. App. 410, 419 , 819 A.2d 871 (victims were sufficiently similar even though three were adult women and one was teen), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912 , 826 A.2d 1156 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. DeJesus
See State v. Johnson, 76 Conn. App. 410, 418 , 819 A.2d 871 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912 , 826 A.2d 1156 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ellis
See State v. Johnson, 76 Conn. App. 410 , 819 A.2d 871 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912 , 826 A.2d 1156 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kuehl v. Z-Loda System Engineering, Inc.
Although we repeatedly have observed that our workers’ compensation “legislation is remedial in nature . . . and . . . should be broadly construed to accomplish its humanitarian purpose”; (citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted) Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp., 222 Conn. 62, 67 , 607 A.2d 431 (1992); the written notice required under § 31-294c (a) nevertheless must “reasonably inform the employer that the employee [or dependent] is claiming or proposes to claim compensation under the [Workers’ Compensation] Act . . . .” Rehtarchik v. Hoyt-Messinger Corp., 118 Conn. 31…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MAURICE NELSON
v.
MAURICE NELSON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 17, 2003.
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition., Margaret Gaffney Rodionovas, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.