State v. Jones, 908 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jones, 908 A.2d 544 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jones v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2010-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jones v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · confidence medium
“At the time the [petitioner] was apprehended, the officers found two Ruger .357 magnum pistols in the vehicle he had been driving, one located on the floor behind the driver’s seat, and the other on the floor behind the front passenger’s seat.” Id., 638.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Andrews (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · confidence medium
Id., 636.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Carter (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jones, 96 Conn. App. 634, 641 , 902 A.2d 17 (“[t]he attempt is complete and punishable, when an act is done with intent to commit the crime, which is adapted to the perpetration of it, whether the purpose fails by reason of interruption ... or for other extrinsic cause” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 919 , 908 A.2d 544 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" City of Norwich v. Shelby-Posello
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Juliano v. Juliano, 96 Conn. App. 381, 386 , 900 A.2d 557 (“[i]n accordance with our policy not to exalt form over substance, we have been reluctant to dismiss appeals for technical deficiencies in an appellant’s appeal form” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 544 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gibson v. Jefferson Woods Community, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Practice Book § 61-9 (‘‘[s]hould the trial court, subsequent to the filing of a pending appeal, make a decision that the appellant desires to have reviewed, the appellant shall file an amended appeal within twenty days from the issuance of notice of the decision’’); see also Juliano v. Juliano, 96 Conn. App. 381, 386 , 900 A.2d 557 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 921 , 908 A.2d 544 (2006).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ANTHONY JONES
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2006.
908 A.2d 544
Gary A. Mastronardi, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 634 (AC 24020), is denied.