green
Positive treatment
12.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Whistnant v. Commissioner of Correction
See Logan v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 744 , 752 n.7, 9 A.3d 776 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 918 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction , 126 Conn. App. 110 , 121, 10 A.3d 1079 (concluding that petitioner's ineffective assistance of habeas counsel claim failed because petitioner had not established prejudice, where challenged testimony during criminal trial was "far from the only evidence linking the petitioner to the murder" and where the "the state also introduced other significant evidence that was probative of the petitioner's guilt"), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bharrat v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn.App. 110 , 132, 10 A.3d 1079 (upholding habeas court's conclusion that "petitioner had abandoned [a] claim because [1] it was not addressed in his posttrial brief and [2] he failed to adduce evidence in support of the claim during the habeas trial"), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011) ; Wooten v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn.App. 793 , 801, 936 A.2d 263 (2007) (claim deemed "abandoned because the petitioner failed to present any evidence in support of his position"), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 911 , 957 A.2d 868 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Commissioner of Correction
See Atkinson v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 632 , 636 n.5, 9 A.3d 407 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 1006 (2011). 2 Witnesses and the parties vary regarding whether the name of this store is Action Auto, Action Audio, Action Auto Center, or Action Auto Sound.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mukhtaar v. Commissioner of Correction
See Atkinson v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 632 , 636 n.5, 9 A.3d 407 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 1006 (2011). 5 Along with his claims about Sierra, Johnston, and Birch, the petitioner claims in his principal brief to this court that there were circumstances surrounding the testimony of Gabree and Sheriff Michael Gariano that should have made both Bodell and Kirschbaum conduct further investigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Olszewski v. Jordan
(2×)
See Jordan v. Jordan, 125 Conn. App. 207 , 6 A.3d 1206 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
Perry v. Commissioner of Correction
See Logan v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 744, 752-53 , 9 A.3d 776 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 918 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
examined
Cited "see"
McKeon v. Lennon
(4×)
See Atkinson v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn.App. 632 , 636 n. 5, 9 A.3d 407 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 1006 (2011). [3] The trial court also ordered each party to pay for one half of all costs associated with (1) work-related after school day care; (2) transportation to and from school; (3) extracurricular activities in excess of $150; and (4) the continued employment of the parties' child care assistant. [4] General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) provides in relevant part: "Unless and to the extent that the decree precludes modification ... any final order for the periodic…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dayton
(2×)
In other words, it is clerical error if the judgment as recorded fails to agree with the judgment in fact rendered ...." (Citations omitted; internal quotations omitted.) Maguire v. Maguire , 222 Conn. 32 , 39-40, 608 A.2d 79 (1992) ; Bank of Stamford v. Schlesinger , 160 Conn.App. 32 , 43, 125 A.3d 209 (2015) ; see also Jordan v. Jordan , 125 Conn.App. 207 , 211, 6 A.3d 1206 (2010) ( General Statutes § 52-212a imposes four month time limit for modification of matters of substance), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 110 , 131–32, 10 A.3d 1079 (declining to second-guess counsel’s decision not to present certain evidence when that evidence might have also inculpated petitioner), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011); see also Harrington v. Richter, supra, 562 U.S. 108–109 (counsel’s representation was not unreasonable when counsel elected not to use evi- dence that might have harmed petitioner’s case); Greiner v. Wells, 417 F.3d 305, 324 (2d Cir. 2005) (‘‘[w]e cannot fault [defense counsel] for refusing to introduce ev…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
(2×)
See, e.g., Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction , 126 Conn.App. 110 , 131-32, 10 A.3d 1079 (declining to second-guess counsel's decision not to present certain evidence when that evidence might have also inculpated petitioner), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011) ; see also Harrington v. Richter , supra, 562 U.S. at 108 -109 , 131 S.Ct. 770 (counsel's representation was not unreasonable when counsel elected not to use evidence that might have harmed petitioner's case); Greiner v. Wells , 417 F.3d 305 , 324 (2d Cir. 2005) ("[w]e cannot fault [defense counsel] for refusing to intro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanley v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Crocker v. Com- missioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 110, 117 , 10 A.3d 1079 (‘‘[a petitioner’s] claims regarding previous habeas counsel will not succeed if the claims of ineffec- tive assistance of trial counsel lack merit’’), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011); Lapointe v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 113 Conn. App. 378, 394 , 966 A.2d 780 (2009) (to prevail on claim of ineffective assistance of habeas counsel predicated on ineffective assistance of trial counsel, petitioner must prove that both habeas counsel and trial counsel were ineffective).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abele Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Sono Stone & Gravel, LLC
(2×)
In accor- dance with Frank v. Streeter, 192 Conn. 601 , 604–605, 472 A.2d 1281 (1984), this court consistently has inter- preted the statute such that ‘[t]he one hundred twenty day period begins to run from the date that the parties file posttrial briefs or other material that the court finds necessary for a well reasoned decision.’ Cowles v. Cowles, 71 Conn. App. 24, 26 , 799 A.2d 1119 (2002); see also Jordan v. Jordan, 125 Conn. App. 207 , 209 n.4, 6 A.3d 1206 (2010) (same), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011); O.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonito v. Bonito
(2×)
In accordance with Frank v. Streeter, 192 Conn. 601, 604-605 , 472 A.2d 1281 (1984), this court consistently has interpreted the statute such that “[t]he one hundred twenty day period begins to run from the date that the parties file posttrial briefs or other material that the court finds necessary for a well reasoned decision.” Cowles v. Cowles, 71 Conn. App. 24, 26 , 799 A.2d 1119 (2002); see also Jordan v. Jordan, 125 Conn. App. 207 , 209 n.4, 6 A.3d 1206 (2010) (same), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011); O.J.
Shawn CROCKER
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2011.
Published
Mark M. Rembish, special public defender, in support of the petition.
James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner Shawn Crocker's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn.App. 110, 10 A.3d 1079 (2011), is denied.