State v. Lahai, 23 A.3d 727 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lahai, 23 A.3d 727 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Prudhomme (connappct, 2022-01-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Prudhomme
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lahai, 128 Conn. App. 448, 468 , 18 A.3d 630 (‘‘the threshold inquiry for purposes of the admissibility of such statements under the confrontation clause is whether they are testimonial in nature’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 727 (2011). ‘‘A police report is a quintessential example of an extrajudicial statement contained in a formalized testimonial material.
cited Cited "see" State v. Benedict
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lahai, 128 Conn. App. 448, 467 , 18 A.3d 630 , cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 727 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lemma v. York & Chapel, Corp.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Jenkins v. Jenkins, 186 Conn. App. 641, 650 , 200 A.3d 1193 (2018) (affirming trial court’s denial of motion to vacate arbitration award and noting that plaintiff failed to show that particular witness’ testi- mony ‘‘would have impacted the outcome of the pro- ceedings’’); see also Hartford Municipal Employees Assn. v. Hartford, 128 Conn. App. 646, 659 , 19 A.3d 193 (testimonial evidence from individual witness was not so central to plaintiff’s case that panel’s failure to con- sider it constituted misconduct), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 730 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel G. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Where, as here, an accused requests an instruction on a defense such as entrapment, he may obtain such a charge by adducing evidence . . . sufficient . . . for a rational juror to find that all the elements of the defense are established by a preponderance of the evi- dence.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 351–53; see generally State v. McNally, 173 Conn. 197 , 200–202, 377 A.2d 286 (1977); State v. Marquardt, 139 Conn. 1 , 4–8, 89 A.2d 219 (1952); see also State v. Wilder, 128 Conn. App. 750, 755 , 17 A.3d 1116 (‘‘[i]t is well established that where…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Windham
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hartford Municipal Employees Assn. v. Hartford, 128 Conn. App. 646, 653-54 , 19 A.3d 193 (construing § 52-418 [a] [3] consistent with 9 U.S.C. § 10 [a] [3]), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 934 , 23 A.3d 730 (2011); McCann v. Dept. of Environmental Protection, 288 Conn. 203, 215 , 952 A.2d 43 (2008) (same); Bridgeport v. Kasper Group, Inc., 278 Conn. 466, 475-76, 899 A.2d 523 (2006) (same); Garrity v. McCaskey, 223 Conn. 1 , 8 n.7, 612 A.2d 742 (1992) (“federal statute that provides for vacating an arbitration award, 9 U.S.C. § 10 [d], is virtually identical to General Statutes § 52-4…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JUMA A. LAHAI
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 6, 2011.
23 A.3d 727
Timothy H. Everett, special public defender, in support of the petition., James M. Ralls, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 448 (AC 30219), is denied.