Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 34 — · Chapter 610 — Uniform Limited Partnership Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 34-30 (2025)

Rights of judgment creditor to charge partnership interest of partner

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
On application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any judgment creditor of a partner, the court may charge the partnership interest of the partner with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the partnership interest. Nothing in this chapter shall be held to deprive a partner of the benefit of any exemption laws applicable to his partnership interest.

(1961, P.A. 79, S. 22; P.A. 79-440, S. 40.)

History: P.A. 79-440 rephrased provisions previously applicable only to limited partners, deleted provision empowering court to appoint receiver and make all other necessary orders, etc., deleted provision which had allowed redemption of interest with separate property of any general partner but not with partnership property, deleted provision which had stated that remedies under section are not exclusive of others which may exist and specified that judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the partnership interest.

Cited. 35 CA 81.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2002 · leading case: Madison Hills Ltd. P'ship II v. Madison Hills, Inc., 644 A.2d 363 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Madison Hills Ltd. P'ship II v. Madison Hills, Inc., 644 A.2d 363 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 20× “In an effort to satisfy the remainder of the judgment, the plaintiff moved for a charging order to be entered against the defendant corporation’s partnership interest in the plaintiff, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 34-30 2 and 34-66. 3 The plaintiff also moved for immediate…”
Kay Yew Koh v. Inno-Pac. Holdings, Ltd., 54 P.3d 1270 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). “Code § 10-12-35 (1975); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 34-30 (West 1961); Del.”
Koh v. Inno-Pac. Holdings, Ltd., 54 P.3d 1270 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). “Code § 10-12-35 (1975); Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann. § 34-30 (1961); Del.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.