Conn. Gen. Stat. § 34-30

Rights of judgment creditor to charge partnership interest of partner

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
On application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any judgment creditor of a partner, the court may charge the partnership interest of the partner with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the partnership interest. Nothing in this chapter shall be held to deprive a partner of the benefit of any exemption laws applicable to his partnership interest.

(1961, P.A. 79, S. 22; P.A. 79-440, S. 40.)

History: P.A. 79-440 rephrased provisions previously applicable only to limited partners, deleted provision empowering court to appoint receiver and make all other necessary orders, etc., deleted provision which had allowed redemption of interest with separate property of any general partner but not with partnership property, deleted provision which had stated that remedies under section are not exclusive of others which may exist and specified that judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the partnership interest.

Cited. 35 CA 81.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2002 · leading case: Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.
Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc. (1994) connappct · cites it 20× “In an effort to satisfy the remainder of the judgment, the plaintiff moved for a charging order to be entered against the defendant corporation’s partnership interest in the plaintiff, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 34-30 2 and 34-66. 3 The plaintiff also moved for immediate…”
Kay Yew Koh v. Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd. (2002) washctapp “Code § 10-12-35 (1975); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 34-30 (West 1961); Del.”
Koh v. Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd. (2002) washctapp “Code § 10-12-35 (1975); Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann. § 34-30 (1961); Del.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.