Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 04 — MANAGEMENT OF STATE AGENCIES · Chapter 54 — Uniform Administrative Procedure Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-184 (2026)

Appeal from final judgment of Superior Court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the Superior Court under this chapter. The appeal shall be taken in accordance with section 51-197b.

(1971, P.A. 854, S. 19; P.A. 76-436, S. 475, 681.)

History: P.A. 76-436 replaced court of common pleas with superior court and made review subject Sec. 52-7, effective July 1, 1978.

Cited. 171 C. 345; Id., 691; 172 C. 263; 173 C. 462; 186 C. 153. Freedom of information commission was not an aggrieved party and therefore was not eligible to appeal. 191 C. 173. Cited. 192 C. 234; 202 C. 405; 204 C. 672; 208 C. 187; 210 C. 597; 216 C. 253.

Cited. 1 CA 1; 17 CA 429; 18 CA 13; 19 CA 489; 30 CA 720; 37 CA 694; 42 CA 519; 45 CA 476.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: Trinity Christian Sch. v. Comm'n on Human Rights, 189 A.3d 79 (Conn. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Trinity Christian Sch. v. Comm'n on Human Rights, 189 A.3d 79 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 6× “" The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court from the judgment of the trial court in accordance with General Statutes § 4-184, and we transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199 (c) and Practice Book § 65-1.”
Lisee v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 782 A.2d 670 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 5× “General Statutes § 4-184 10 restricts an appellate court’s subject matter jurisdiction in the context of administrative appeals to appeals from final judgments.”
Ensign-Bickford Realty Corp. v. Zoning Comm'n, 715 A.2d 701 (Conn. 1998). · cites it 6× “General Statutes §§ 4-184 and 51-197b (d).”
Lagassey v. State, 846 A.2d 831 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 3× “General Statutes § 4-184. Indeed, the plaintiffs in Catz and Taylor could have discovered their legal injuries sooner, but that did not compel the conclusion that they should have done so.”
Goldstar Med. Servs., Inc. v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 955 A.2d 15 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 2× “General Statutes §§ 4-184 and 51-197b (d).”
Lieberman v. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 579 A.2d 505 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 2× “The appeals from the trial court’s judgment in that case, therefore, are dismissed.”
Convalescent Ctr. of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Dep't of Income Maint., 544 A.2d 604 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 2× “Because the trial court ordered a remand of this case for further administrative proceedings, we must inquire into the possibility that there has not as yet been a final judgment.”
Blinkoff v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 20 A.3d 1272 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, pursuant to General Statutes § 4-184, 6 an administrative appeal from a decision of the *720 Superior Court is governed by General Statutes § 51-197b, 7 which provides in subsection (a) that appeals from an agency decision “shall be taken to the Superior Court” and…”
Schieffelin & Co. v. Dep't of Liquor Control, 521 A.2d 566 (Conn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Upon examination of the briefs and records before oral argument of these appeals, this court sua sponte issued an order of notice to the parties that the appeals might be dismissed for lack of a final judgment.”
Local 1303 & Local 1378 of Council No. 4 v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 463 A.2d 613 (Conn. 1983). · cites it 2× “1 General Statutes § 4-184 provides: “appeal from final judgment of SUPERIOR COURT.”
Hendel's Investors Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 771 A.2d 182 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “The next section of the UAPA, General Statutes § 4-184, provides: “An aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the Superior Court under this chapter.”
Rules Comm. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 472 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1984). · cites it 2× “The two cases were consolidated for purposes of the Rules Committee’s appeal to the Superior Court. The defendant Monroe did not petition this court for certification, and she is not a party to this appeal.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.