Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-135

Notice in sales agreement. Seller to complete prior to signing by buyer

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 42-135 is repealed.

(1967, P.A. 749, S. 3; 1969, P.A. 178, S. 1; 1972, P.A. 141; P.A. 76-165, S. 7, 8.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–2015 · leading case: Habetz v. Condon

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Habetz v. Condon (1992) conn · cites it 2× “The plaintiff asserted, inter alia, the special defenses that the writing requirements of the act; General Statutes § 20-429; and the notice provisions of the Home Solicitation Sales Act; General Statutes § 42-135 (a); had not been satisfied.”

Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC (2015) ctd · cites it 2× “The Court has already concluded that GreenSky did not know that the loan application it received was completed without Ms. Bentley’s permission. Thus, it cannot have violated the forgery statute, which requires an “intent to defraud, deceive or injure another.”

Associated Credit Co. v. Lawrence Nogic (1974) connappct · cites it 5× “, that the note is subject to all claims and defenses which the defendants might have against Holiday, that the note was based on a home solicitation sale, and that the agree *747 ment on which the sale was based was void and of no effect because it failed to contain the wording…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.