Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-36c (2025)
Form of premarital agreement
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A premarital agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. It shall be enforceable without consideration.
(P.A. 95-170, S. 2, 11.)
History: P.A. 95-170 effective October 1, 1995, and applicable to premarital agreements executed on or after that date.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: Hornung v. Hornung, 146 A.3d 912 (Conn. 2016).
Hornung v. Hornung, 146 A.3d 912 (Conn. 2016). “See Gen- eral Statutes §§ 46b-36c and 46b-36d. It also sets forth the factors that courts are to consider in determining whether premarital agreements are enforceable.”
Dornemann v. Dornemann, 850 A.2d 273 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2004). “” General Statutes § 46b-36b (1). Although the definition does not specify that the agreement must be written, General Statutes § 46b-36c states that the agreement “shall be in writing and signed by both parties.”
Bedrick v. Bedrick, 17 A.3d 17 (Conn. 2011). “General Statutes § 46b-36c, however, expressly provides that prenuptial agreements are enforceable without consideration.”
Dove v. Dove, 680 S.E.2d 839 (Ga. 2009). “Code § 1611); Connecticut (Conn. Gen.Stat.Ann. § 46b-36c); Delaware (Del.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.