Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-225a

Reduction in economic damages in personal injury and wrongful death actions for collateral source payments

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In any civil action, whether in tort or in contract, wherein the claimant seeks to recover damages resulting from (1) personal injury or wrongful death occurring on or after October 1, 1987, or (2) personal injury or wrongful death, arising out of the rendition of professional services by a health care provider, occurring on or after October 1, 1985, and prior to October 1, 1986, if the action was filed on or after October 1, 1987, and wherein liability is admitted or is determined by the trier of fact and damages are awarded to compensate the claimant, the court shall reduce the amount of such award which represents economic damages, as defined in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 52-572h, by an amount equal to the total of amounts determined to have been paid under subsection (b) of this section less the total of amounts determined to have been paid, contributed or forfeited under subsection (c) of this section, except that there shall be no reduction for (A) a collateral source for which a right of subrogation exists, and (B) the amount of collateral sources equal to the reduction in the claimant's economic damages attributable to the claimant's percentage of negligence pursuant to section 52-572h.

(b) Upon a finding of liability and an awarding of damages by the trier of fact and before the court enters judgment, the court shall receive evidence from the claimant and other appropriate persons concerning the total amount of collateral sources which have been paid for the benefit of the claimant as of the date the court enters judgment. For purposes of this subsection, evidence that a physician or physician assistant, dentist, chiropractor, naturopath, physical therapist, podiatrist, psychologist, social worker, mental health professional, an emergency medical technician, optometrist, or advanced practice registered nurse, accepted an amount less than the total amount of any bill generated by such physician, physician assistant, dentist, chiropractor, naturopath, physical therapist, podiatrist, psychologist, social worker, mental health professional, emergency medical technician, optometrist or advanced practice registered nurse, or evidence that an insurer paid less than the total amount of any bill generated by such physician, physician assistant, dentist, chiropractor, naturopath, physical therapist, podiatrist, psychologist, social worker, mental health professional, emergency medical technician, optometrist or advanced practice registered nurse, shall be admissible as evidence of the total amount of collateral sources which have been paid for the benefit of the claimant as of the date the court enters judgment.

(c) The court shall receive evidence from the claimant and any other appropriate person concerning any amount which has been paid, contributed or forfeited, as of the date the court enters judgment, by, or on behalf of, the claimant or members of his immediate family to secure his right to any collateral source benefit which he has received as a result of such injury or death.

(P.A. 85-574, S. 1; P.A. 86-338, S. 4; P.A. 87-227, S. 4; P.A. 07-217, S. 191; P.A. 10-36, S. 9; P.A. 12-142, S. 2; P.A. 14-37, S. 2.)

History: P.A. 86-338 deleted provision which limited operation of section to actions arising out of the rendition of professional services by a health care provider and expanded section to include any civil action accruing on or after October 1, 1986 seeking compensation for personal injury or wrongful death, and added provision prohibiting reduction in the award for the amount of collateral sources equal to the reduction in the claimant's recoverable damages attributable to his percentage of negligence; P.A. 87-227 divided section into Subsecs., amended Subsec. (a) to change applicability of section from “In any civil action, accruing on or after October 1, 1986, whether in tort or in contract, wherein the claimant seeks compensation for personal injury or wrongful death” to “In any civil action, whether in tort or in contract, wherein the claimant seeks to recover damages resulting from (1) personal injury or wrongful death occurring on or after October 1, 1987, or (2) personal injury or wrongful death arising out of the rendition of professional services by a health care provider, occurring on or after October 1, 1985, and prior to October 1, 1986, if the action was filed on or after October 1, 1987,” provide the reduction shall be in “economic” damages, and replace the provision that reduction shall be by “the total of all amounts paid to the claimant from all collateral sources which are available to him” with reduction by “an amount equal to the total of amounts determined to have been paid under subsection (b) less the total of amounts determined to have been paid under subsection (c)”, amended Subsec. (b) to require the court to receive evidence “before it enters judgment” concerning collateral sources paid “as of the date the court enters judgment”, and amended Subsec. (c) to replace requirement that the court “also take testimony” with requirement that the court “receive evidence from the claimant and any other appropriate person,” and to specify that the amount is that paid, contributed or forfeited “as of the date the court enters judgment” and that the collateral source benefit is that which he “has received” rather than “is receiving”; P.A. 07-217 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), effective July 12, 2007; P.A. 10-36 amended Subsec. (a) to replace “paid under subsection (c)” with “paid, contributed or forfeited under subsection (c)” and amended Subsec. (c) to make a technical change, effective July 1, 2010; P.A. 12-142 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision re evidence that certain health care providers accepted an amount less than the total amount of a bill generated by such providers to be admissible as evidence of the total amount of collateral sources paid for the benefit of claimant, effective October 1, 2012, and applicable to all actions pending on or filed on or after that date; P.A. 14-37 amended Subsec. (b) by deleting chapter references re licensure or certification and adding references to social worker and mental health professional, effective October 1, 2014, and applicable to all actions pending on or filed on or after that date.

Cited. 203 C. 607; 206 C. 16; 212 C. 217; 214 C. 1; 218 C. 531. Collateral source payments under section are applicable to determine amount of damages but not to determine amount of coverage. 225 C. 566. Cited. 229 C. 99. Application and interpretation of section discussed; deemed not unconstitutionally vague. 231 C. 77. Cited. 235 C. 107. Intent to prevent plaintiffs from obtaining double recoveries. 248 C. 409. Only payments specifically corresponding with items of damages included in jury's verdict are to be deducted as collateral sources from the economic damages award, not total amount paid by collateral sources for the medical bills, and burden is on defendant to submit interrogatories to jury concerning specific items of damages included within verdict. 269 C. 1. When any right of subrogation exists, whether in full or in part, for a collateral source, section precludes trial court from ordering any collateral source reduction at all. 324 C. 70.

Cited. 29 CA 484; 31 CA 584; Id., 806; 33 CA 99; 34 CA 444; 37 CA 784; 38 CA 685; 46 CA 76; 47 CA 365. Statute requires reduction of economic damages by the total of all collateral source payments received, less the total of premiums paid to secure the collateral sources. 77 CA 238.

Subsec. (a):

When the amount of collateral sources received by plaintiff is less than or equal to the amount of reduction in claimant's economic damages attributable to claimant's own negligence, there shall be no collateral source reduction in the award. 55 CA 150.

Subsec. (b):

Trial court did not improperly allow evidence of collateral sources to be admitted to jury. 102 CA 93.

Subsec. (c):

Where the only collateral source benefit that plaintiff received as result of automobile accident was medical payments under plaintiff's automobile insurance policy, plaintiff was entitled to offset the collateral source reduction of her economic damage award by the cost of her medical payments coverage only. 263 C. 93.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2023 · leading case: Jones v. Kramer
Jones v. Kramer (2004) conn · cites it 52× “In a personal injury action, General Statutes § 52-225a 1 authorizes the trial court to reduce the plain *339 tiffs economic damages award by an amount equal to the sum of collateral source payments received by the plaintiff, less any amount paid by or on behalf of the plaintiff…”
Fleming v. Garnett (1994) conn · cites it 28× “After a posttrial hearing, the court reduced the jury award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-225a, to reflect collateral source benefits received by the plaintiff, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff.”
Alvarado v. Black (1999) conn · cites it 40× “The sole issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-225a 1 an injured plaintiff, whose economic damages are reduced because of the collateral source doctrine, is entitled to an offset from that reduction to reflect insurance premiums paid by the employer…”
Marciano v. Jiminez (2016) conn · cites it 36× “When a plaintiff receives an award of damages in a civil action for personal injuries, General Statutes § 52-225a 1 requires the trial court to reduce the award to reflect collateral source payments received by the plaintiff.”
Haynes v. Yale-New Haven Hospital (1997) conn · cites it 10× “My conclusion that underinsured motorist benefits is a collateral source is further buttressed by General Statutes §§ 52-225a and 52-225b, 12 which provide that *55 an award of economic damages, based on personal injury or wrongful death, shall be reduced by the trial court,…”
Smith v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America (1993) conn · cites it 19× “The issue in this case, on certification from the United States District Court, is whether the provisions of General Statutes § 52-225a 1 governing *568 collateral source payments apply to a claim for underinsured motorist benefits.”
Jones v. Riley (2003) conn · cites it 32× “Specifically, we must decide whether the plaintiff is entitled to a credit, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-225a (c), 2 for the amount *95 of premiums paid for the entire policy, or for that portion of the premiums attributable to the medical payments coverage only.”
Jones v. Kramer (2002) connappct · cites it 38× “The plaintiff claims that the court improperly applied General Statutes § 52-225a 1 to reduce the jury’s award of *791 economic damages by the amount of collateral source payments he had received.”
Thomas v. Department of Developmental Services (2010) conn · cites it 8× “In support of this claim, the plaintiff notes that the collateral source rule, which is codified at General Statutes § 52-225a, also was intended to prevent double recoveries; however, § 52-225a (b) 9 explicitly requires a hearing so that evidence may be presented regarding…”
Mack v. LaValley (1999) connappct · cites it 13× “The trial court concluded that no reduction in the economic damages award was warranted by the applicable statute, General Statutes § 52-225a (a). The trial court explained that because the plaintiff had received the amount of $4275.”
Vitti v. Allstate Insurance (1998) conn · cites it 11× “Moreover, that particular issue is not before us and we need not address it.”
Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc. (1993) connappct · cites it 12× “62, arguing that under General Statutes § 52-225a, that portion of the award constituting past *811 economic damages must be reduced by any amount received by the plaintiff from collateral sources.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-225a(b) — 1 case
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-225a(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.