United States v. Gomez, 119 F. App'x 679 (5th Cir. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gomez, 119 F. App'x 679 (5th Cir. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 37638.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jorge GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
04-10054.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 20, 2005.
119 F. App'x 679
Susan B Cowger, Aaron Wiley, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Jorge Gomez, Fort Dix, NJ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Wiener, Benavides, Stewart.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM: *

Jorge Gomez, federal inmate #32875-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 to correct the Presentence Report (PSR). The Government’s motion to dismiss Gomez’s appeal as frivolous is DENIED. Further briefing, however, is unnecessary.

Complaints regarding the contents of a PSR must be raised prior to the imposition of sentence; therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Gomez’s postsentence motion to correct the PSR. See United States v. Engs, 884 F.2d 894, 895-97 (5th Cir.1989). This court is, therefore, without jurisdiction over Gomez’s appeal. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir.2000). The judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.