United States v. Juri Ripinsky, United States of Am. v. J. Malcolm Kingston, 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Juri Ripinsky, United States of Am. v. J. Malcolm Kingston, 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“while unruh involved section 656 rather than section 1344, the same concerns apply .”
21 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. John C. Whitehead (ca8, 1999-04-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. John C. Whitehead
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
while unruh involved section 656 rather than section 1344, the same concerns apply .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wright
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1444 , amended on other grounds, 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997); United States v. Aramony, 88 F.3d 1369, 1386 (4th Cir.1996); United States v. Lowder, 5 F.3d 467, 472 (10th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wright
2d Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1444 , amended on other grounds, 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997); United States v. Aramony, 88 F.3d 1369, 1386 (4th Cir.1996); United States v. Lowder, 5 F.3d 467, 472 (10th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wilson
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1442 (9th Cir.), amended by 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc); United States v. Williams, 291 F.3d 1180, 1189 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thongsangoune Sayakhom (2×)
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1442 (9th Cir.), as amended by 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 870 (1998), overruled on other grounds see United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir. 1997); United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir. 1996). 25 * Sayakhom challenges the introduction of evidence regarding her Mutual Assistance Planning Services Program ("MAPS").
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gulmohamed Abdulkader SERANG, Defendant-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ripinsky, 109 F.3d at 1442 (9th Cir.), as amended, 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997) cert. denied - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 870 , 139 L.Ed.2d 767 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wayne Anderson (2×)
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1443-44 (9th Cir. 1997), as amended by 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wayne Anderson (2×)
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ripinsky, 109 F.3d 1436, 1443-44 (9th Cir.1997), as amended by 129 F.3d 518 (9th Cir.1997).
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juri RIPINSKY, Defendant-Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. Malcolm KINGSTON, Defendant-Appellant
94-50486, 94-50488.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 13, 1997.
129 F.3d 518
Wallace, Kozinski, Rymer.
Cited by 19 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 84%
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

The opinion in the above case, filed on March 28, 1997 [109 F.3d 1436], is amended as follows:

At slip op. 3500, lines 3-4 [109 F.3d at 1440], delete “for locating the properties” and replace with “to compensate fictitious real estate brokerages which.”

At slip op. 3501, line 2 [109 F.3d at 1440, right column, line 15], change “he” to “Kingston.”

At slip op. 3506, second full paragraph (starting “Because Ripinsky”), line 4 [109 F.3d at 1443], delete from sentence starting “Our recent” to end of the paragraph; add the next paragraph to the second full paragraph; change the citation of Turman to “United States v. Turman, 122 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir.1997) (Turman)”.

At slip op. 3507 [109 F.3d at 1443], change the citation after the indented quote to “Id., 122 F.3d at 1170 (citation omitted).”

At slip op. 3507 [109 F.3d at 1443], third line after indented quote, insert the following after “Stein.”: “See United States v. Golb, 69 F.3d 1417, 1428 (9th Cir.1995) (reviewing Stein error for plain error), cert. denied, —[*519] U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1369, 134 L.Ed.2d 534 (1996).”

At slip op. 3510, line 4 [109 F.3d at 1444, 1445], delete last sentence and citation in the carryover paragraph (“There was no ... at 878.”); add the following sentence, “The law at the time of trial was not ‘settled and clearly contrary to the law at the time of appeal.’ Turman, 122 F.3d at 1170 (citation omitted).”

At slip op. 3510, first fall paragraph, line 5 [109 F.3d at 1445], change Turman citation to “Turman, 122 F.3d at 1171.”

At slip op. 3512, first full paragraph, lines 13-20 [109 F.3d at 1446], delete last sentence and citation following: “Moreover, the government ... authority to depart).”

With the above amendments, the panel as constituted above has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The petitions for rehearing are denied, and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are rejected.