United States v. Ponzini, 278 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2008). · Go Syfert
United States v. Ponzini, 278 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Murphy (ca4, 2009-01-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Murphy (2×)
4th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Young, 278 Fed.Appx. 242 , 245-46 (4th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (holding that officers may retrieve text messages from cell phone during search incident to arrest), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 514 , — L.Ed.2d-(2008); United States v. Hunter, No. 96-4259, 1998 WL 887289 , at *3 (4th Cir. Oct.29, 1998) (holding that officers may retrieve telephone numbers from pager during search incident to arrest).
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee,
v.
Robert Louis PONZINI, Defendant—Appellant
08-6075.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 15, 2008.
278 F. App'x 242
Robert Louis Ponzini, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Niemeyer, Traxler, Duncan.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:

Robert Louis Ponzini appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Ponzini’s motion to modify conditions of supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ponzini, No. 3:02-cr-00423-JRS (E.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.